Rik Peeters
- Political Science and International Relations top 2%
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Public Administration top 2%
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Economics and Econometrics top 10%
- Co-authors
- Mariana ChudnovskyMarc SchuilenburgAnat GofenElizabeth O’ConnorGabriela LottaGuillermo M. CejudoSusan M. Miller
- Topics
- Public Policy and Administration Research (11 papers)E-Government and Public Services (8 papers)Local Government Finance and Decentralization (7 papers)
- Journals
- Public Administration ReviewJournal of Public Administration Research and TheoryGovernment Information Quarterly
- Partner nations
- MexicoNetherlandsBrazil
In The Last Decade
Rik Peeters
38 papers receiving 828 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
- Political Science and International Relations 320
- Sociology and Political Science 315
- Public Administration 193
- General Health Professions 139
- Economics and Econometrics 121
Countries citing papers authored by Rik Peeters
This map shows the geographic impact of Rik Peeters's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rik Peeters with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rik Peeters more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Rik Peeters
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rik Peeters. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rik Peeters. The network helps show where Rik Peeters may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Rik Peeters
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Rik Peeters. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Rik Peeters based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Rik Peeters. Rik Peeters is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 44 | |
| 6 | 17 | |
| 7 | 5 | |
| 8 | 26 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 34 | |
| 11 | 32 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 107 | |
| 14 | Burocracia de baja confianza | 1 |
| 15 | 36 | |
| 16 | 11 | |
| 17 | De poortwachterstaat als hoeder van de participatiesamenleving | 1 |
| 18 | 12 | |
| 19 | 3 | |
| 20 | 4 |
About Rik Peeters
Rik Peeters is a scholar working on Public Administration, Political Science and International Relations and Safety Research, having authored 41 papers that have together received 868 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Public Policy and Administration Research (11 papers), E-Government and Public Services (8 papers) and Local Government Finance and Decentralization (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (193 citations), Political Science and International Relations (320 citations) and Safety Research (77 citations). Rik Peeters has collaborated with scholars based in Mexico, Netherlands and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include Mariana Chudnovsky, Marc Schuilenburg, Anat Gofen, Elizabeth O’Connor, Gabriela Lotta, Guillermo M. Cejudo, Susan M. Miller and Elizabeth O’Connor. Their work appears in journals such as Public Administration Review, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory and Government Information Quarterly.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.