Richard Storry

715 citations
28 papers · 254 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Richard Storry

24 papers receiving 167 citations

Peers

Richard Storry
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Cultural Studies 74
  • Political Science and International Relations 55
  • Sociology and Political Science 93
  • Industrial relations 1
  • Anthropology 16
Replace Richard M. Dalfiume with:
Richard M. Dalfiume United States
Clarence E. Glick United States
John B. Kirby United States
Rayford W. Loģan United States
Carl R. Lovitt
Guo Jin United Kingdom
James M. McCutcheon United States
Frederick B. Pike United States
Orville Schell United States
Matt S. Meier United States
Richard Storry relative to Richard M. Dalfiume United States Richard M. Dalfiume's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Richard M. Dalfiume · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Richard Storry

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Richard Storry's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard Storry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard Storry more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Richard Storry

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard Storry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard Storry. The network helps show where Richard Storry may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 13 scholars most cited alongside Richard Storry, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Richard Storry Line = papers co-authored together Richard Storry links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 197643
2 197242
3
A history of modern Japan
196034
4 196427
5 197225
6 195813
7 197010
8 19659
9 19638
10 19796
11 19785
12
Mirror, Sword and Jewel: The Geometry of Japanese Life
19814
13
The case of Richard Sorge
19664
14 19773
15 19643
16 19583
17 19633
18 19733
19 19722
20 19582

About Richard Storry

Richard Storry is a scholar working on Cultural Studies, Political Science and International Relations, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and History, having authored 28 papers that have together received 254 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Japanese History and Culture (6 papers), Intelligence, Security, War Strategy (1 paper), European history and politics (1 paper), German History and Society (1 paper), Leadership, Courage, and Heroism Studies (1 paper) and Vietnamese History and Culture Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cultural Studies (74 citations), Political Science and International Relations (55 citations), Sociology and Political Science (93 citations), Industrial relations (1 citation) and Anthropology (16 citations). Richard Storry has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and South Sudan. Frequent co-authors include Ivan Morris, John W. Hall, Ezra F. Vogel, Richard H. Minear, George M. Wilson, Bernard S. Silberman, Gordon M. Berger, Milton W. Meyer, John S. Brownlee and Thomas R. H. Havens. Their work appears in journals such as Pacific Affairs, International Affairs, The China Quarterly, Journal of Japanese Studies and Monumenta Nipponica.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact