Frederick B. Pike

504 citations
31 papers · 304 indexed · h-index 9
Topics
Historical Studies in Latin America (6 papers)Political and Social Dynamics in Chile and Latin America (4 papers)International Relations in Latin America (2 papers)
Partner nations
United States

In The Last Decade

Frederick B. Pike

27 papers receiving 197 citations

Peers

Frederick B. Pike
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
  • Sociology and Political Science 130
  • Political Science and International Relations 91
  • Anthropology 57
  • Cultural Studies 48
  • Demography 42
Replace Mark D. Szuchman with:
Mark D. Szuchman United States
Charles S. Blackton United States
Thomas F. McGann United States
Louis L. Snyder United States
Mark Naidis
Herman Lebovics United States
Benoît de L’Estoile France
Elizabeth Anne Kuznesof United States
Tejúmólá Ọláníyan United States
Christine Hünefeldt United States
Frederick B. Pike relative to Mark D. Szuchman United States Mark D. Szuchman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Mark D. Szuchman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Frederick B. Pike

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Frederick B. Pike's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frederick B. Pike with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frederick B. Pike more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Frederick B. Pike

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frederick B. Pike. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frederick B. Pike. The network helps show where Frederick B. Pike may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Frederick B. Pike

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Frederick B. Pike. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Frederick B. Pike based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Frederick B. Pike. Frederick B. Pike is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 19
2 3
3 0
4 2
5 38
6 7
7 64
8 21
9 5
10 6
11 4
12 15
13 30
14 3
15 2
16 5
17 0
18 12
19 0
20 1

About Frederick B. Pike

Frederick B. Pike is a scholar working on Demography, Development and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 31 papers that have together received 304 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Historical Studies in Latin America (6 papers), Political and Social Dynamics in Chile and Latin America (4 papers) and International Relations in Latin America (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anthropology (57 citations), Cultural Studies (48 citations) and Visual Arts and Performing Arts (24 citations). Frederick B. Pike has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include James M. Malloy, Claudio Véliz, Arthur P. Whitaker, James Petras, Jérome Slater, Benjamin Frankel, Carol Graham, Frederick M. Nunn, David C. Hendrickson and William V. D’Antonio. Their work appears in journals such as Foreign Affairs, The American Historical Review and Hispanic American Historical Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026