Richard Smith
- Immunology top 5%
- Surgery top 10%
- Molecular Biology
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism top 5%
- Genetics top 10%
- Co-authors
- David C. WraithPaul J. FairchildDimitris KioussisJohn R. ProwleGuy A. RutterIsabelle LeclercSarah RichardsS. E. Cross
- Topics
- Pancreatic function and diabetes (12 papers)Immune Cell Function and Interaction (11 papers)T-cell and B-cell Immunology (8 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomAustraliaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Richard Smith
44 papers receiving 1.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 129
- Immunology 538
- Surgery 436
- Molecular Biology 367
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 207
- Genetics 187
Countries citing papers authored by Richard Smith
This map shows the geographic impact of Richard Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard Smith more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Richard Smith
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard Smith. The network helps show where Richard Smith may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Richard Smith
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Richard Smith. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Richard Smith based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Richard Smith. Richard Smith is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 16 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | Rituximab-Associated Hypogammaglobulinaemia: Incidence, Outcomes and Effect of Dose in Patients with Multi-System Autoimmune Disease | 1 |
| 5 | 42 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | 20 | |
| 8 | 44 | |
| 9 | 30 | |
| 10 | 23 | |
| 11 | 80 | |
| 12 | 9 | |
| 13 | 153 | |
| 14 | 32 | |
| 15 | 9 | |
| 16 | Welfare of the individual and the group: Malthus and externalities. | 4 |
| 17 | 14 | |
| 18 | 185 | |
| 19 | 355 | |
| 20 | Fetal brain disorders : recent approaches to the problem of mental deficiency | 17 |
About Richard Smith
Richard Smith is a scholar working on Transplantation, Immunology and Surgery, having authored 47 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pancreatic function and diabetes (12 papers), Immune Cell Function and Interaction (11 papers) and T-cell and B-cell Immunology (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Immunology (538 citations), Transplantation (65 citations) and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (207 citations). Richard Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include David C. Wraith, Paul J. Fairchild, Dimitris Kioussis, John R. Prowle, Guy A. Rutter, Isabelle Leclerc, Sarah Richards, S. E. Cross, Mark Wing and G Hale. Their work appears in journals such as The Lancet, Journal of Clinical Investigation and Immunity.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.