Clinical Transplantation

5.8k papers and 86.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 5.8k papers published in Clinical Transplantation in the last decades have received a total of 86.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Clinical Transplantation usually cover Surgery (3.1k papers), Transplantation (2.5k papers) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (1.2k papers) specifically the topics of Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments (2.4k papers), Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes (1.9k papers) and Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes (1.2k papers). The most active scholars publishing in Clinical Transplantation are David E.R. Sutherland, Raymund R. Razonable, Angelika C. Gruessner, R Cortesini, Arthur J. Matas, Atul Humar, Ronald M. Ferguson, Mitchell L. Henry, Parmjeet Randhawa and Elsie M. Eugui.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Clinical Transplantation

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Clinical Transplantation. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Clinical Transplantation.

Countries where authors publish in Clinical Transplantation

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Clinical Transplantation. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Clinical Transplantation with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Clinical Transplantation more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025