Countries where authors publish in Clinical Transplantation
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Clinical Transplantation. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Clinical Transplantation with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Clinical Transplantation more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Clinical Transplantation
This network shows the impact of papers published in Clinical Transplantation. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Clinical Transplantation.
About Clinical Transplantation
The 5.9k papers published in Clinical Transplantation in the last decades have received a total of 92.5k indexed citations . Papers published in Clinical Transplantation usually cover Transplantation (2.5k papers), Hepatology (1.2k papers) and Surgery (3.1k papers) specifically the topics of Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments (2.4k papers), Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes (1.9k papers), Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes (1.2k papers), Liver Disease and Transplantation (997 papers), Organ Donation and Transplantation (908 papers), Renal and Vascular Pathologies (394 papers), Neurological Complications and Syndromes (383 papers) and Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment (348 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Clinical Transplantation are Raymund R. Razonable, David E.R. Sutherland, Angelika C. Gruessner, Ronald M. Ferguson, Atul Humar, Arthur J. Matas, Mitchell L. Henry, Robert J. Stratta, Elsie M. Eugui and A. C. Allison.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.