Richard Scott
- Global and Planetary Change top 10%
- Nature and Landscape Conservation top 10%
- Ecology
- Aquatic Science top 10%
- Physiology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Laurence T. KellM.A. PastoorsJean‐Marc FromentinDorleta GarcíaSimon MardleJan Jaap PoosPhilippe GrosjeanScott Finlay
- Topics
- Traffic and Road Safety (4 papers)Fusion materials and technologies (3 papers)Urban Transport and Accessibility (3 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaRenewable EnergySolar Energy Materials and Solar Cells
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesSpain
In The Last Decade
Richard Scott
15 papers receiving 319 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
- Global and Planetary Change 229
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 169
- Ecology 62
- Aquatic Science 45
- Physiology 32
Countries citing papers authored by Richard Scott
This map shows the geographic impact of Richard Scott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard Scott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard Scott more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Richard Scott
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard Scott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard Scott. The network helps show where Richard Scott may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Richard Scott
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Richard Scott. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Richard Scott based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Richard Scott. Richard Scott is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | The signs they are a-changin': development and evaluation of New Zealand's rural intersection active warning system | 4 |
| 5 | 10 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 11 | |
| 8 | 34 | |
| 9 | Safety at Kerbside Tram Stops - Accident Analysis and Mitigation | 1 |
| 10 | 16 | |
| 11 | 200 | |
| 12 | 37 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 39 |
About Richard Scott
Richard Scott is a scholar working on Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality, Transportation and Music, having authored 15 papers that have together received 360 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Traffic and Road Safety (4 papers), Fusion materials and technologies (3 papers) and Urban Transport and Accessibility (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (169 citations), Global and Planetary Change (229 citations) and Music (30 citations). Richard Scott has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Laurence T. Kell, M.A. Pastoors, Jean‐Marc Fromentin, Dorleta García, Simon Mardle, Jan Jaap Poos, Philippe Grosjean, Scott Finlay, Ernesto Jardim and Richard Hillary. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Renewable Energy and Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.