Richard R. Hark
- Analytical Chemistry top 0.5%
- Analytical chemistry methods development 9
- Archeology top 0.5%
- Cultural Heritage Materials Analysis 15
- Conservation top 1%
- Conservation Techniques and Studies 4
- Mechanics of Materials top 2%
- Laser-induced spectroscopy and plasma 12
- Earth-Surface Processes top 5%
- Building materials and conservation 4
-
- Web Data Mining and Analysis 2
-
- Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications 2
-
- Forensic Fingerprint Detection Methods 2
- Co-authors
- Russell S. HarmonRichard E. RussoRobin J. H. ClarkN. SenesiLucía BurgioMichael A. WiseC J M LawleyJeremiah J. Remus
- Journals
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (1 paper)Journal of the American Chemical Society (1 paper)Tetrahedron Letters (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomGermany
In The Last Decade
Richard R. Hark
27 papers receiving 944 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
- Analytical Chemistry 473
- Archeology 395
- Conservation 112
- Mechanics of Materials 589
- Earth-Surface Processes 109
Countries citing papers authored by Richard R. Hark
This map shows the geographic impact of Richard R. Hark's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard R. Hark with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard R. Hark more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Richard R. Hark
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard R. Hark. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard R. Hark. The network helps show where Richard R. Hark may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Richard R. Hark, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2023 | 4 | |
| 2 | 2022 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2021 | 2 | |
| 4 | 2020 | 115 | |
| 5 | 2020 | 13 | |
| 6 | 2019 | 93 | |
| 7 | 2018 | 35 | |
| 8 | 2017 | 48 | |
| 9 | 2014 | 9 | |
| 10 | 2012 | 19 | |
| 11 | 2012 | 36 | |
| 12 | 2012 | 7 | |
| 13 | 2011 | 36 | |
| 14 | 2010 | 28 | |
| 15 | 2008 | 9 | |
| 16 | 2001 | 1 | |
| 17 | 2001 | 16 | |
| 18 | 1994 | 20 | |
| 19 | 1990 | 90 | |
| 20 | 1987 | 1 |
About Richard R. Hark
Richard R. Hark is a scholar working on Chemical Health and Safety, Archeology and Conservation, having authored 28 papers that have together received 975 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cultural Heritage Materials Analysis (15 papers), Laser-induced spectroscopy and plasma (12 papers), Analytical chemistry methods development (9 papers), Building materials and conservation (4 papers), Conservation Techniques and Studies (4 papers), Web Data Mining and Analysis (2 papers), Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (2 papers) and Forensic Fingerprint Detection Methods (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Analytical Chemistry (473 citations), Archeology (395 citations) and Conservation (112 citations). Richard R. Hark has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Russell S. Harmon, Richard E. Russo, Robin J. H. Clark, N. Senesi, Lucía Burgio, Michael A. Wise, C J M Lawley, Jeremiah J. Remus, Kenneth D. Morton and Leslie M. Collins. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Journal of the American Chemical Society and Tetrahedron Letters.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.