Richard Q. Bell
- Clinical Psychology top 0.5%
- Education top 0.5%
- Social Psychology top 0.5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 1%
- Sociology and Political Science top 2%
- Co-authors
- Earl S. SchaeferDaniel S. ShawMary F. WaldropFrank A. PedersenMichael ChapmanGeorge M. WellerMiles GilliomJohn J. McArdle
- Topics
- Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (16 papers)Early Childhood Education and Development (13 papers)Infant Health and Development (8 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCzechiaPakistan
In The Last Decade
Richard Q. Bell
69 papers receiving 4.6k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 147
- Clinical Psychology 3.1k
- Education 1.4k
- Social Psychology 1.3k
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 854
- Sociology and Political Science 685
Countries citing papers authored by Richard Q. Bell
This map shows the geographic impact of Richard Q. Bell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard Q. Bell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard Q. Bell more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Richard Q. Bell
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard Q. Bell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard Q. Bell. The network helps show where Richard Q. Bell may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Richard Q. Bell
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Richard Q. Bell. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Richard Q. Bell based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Richard Q. Bell. Richard Q. Bell is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | |
| 2 | 223 | |
| 3 | Fragmentation and the self | 1 |
| 4 | 290 | |
| 5 | 84 | |
| 6 | 7 | |
| 7 | 5 | |
| 8 | 8 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 95 | |
| 11 | 15 | |
| 12 | 15 | |
| 13 | 19 | |
| 14 | 3 | |
| 15 | 26 | |
| 16 | 27 | |
| 17 | 85 | |
| 18 | 19 | |
| 19 | DEVELOPMENT OF A PARENTAL ATTITUDE RESEARCH INSTRUMENT1breakdown → | 434 |
| 20 | 109 |
About Richard Q. Bell
Richard Q. Bell is a scholar working on Pharmacy, Clinical Psychology and Developmental and Educational Psychology, having authored 69 papers that have together received 5.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (16 papers), Early Childhood Education and Development (13 papers) and Infant Health and Development (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (3.1k citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (854 citations) and Social Psychology (1.3k citations). Richard Q. Bell has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Czechia and Pakistan. Frequent co-authors include Earl S. Schaefer, Daniel S. Shaw, Mary F. Waldrop, Frank A. Pedersen, Michael Chapman, George M. Weller, Miles Gilliom, John J. McArdle, Emily B. Winslow and Joan I. Vondra. Their work appears in journals such as Science, Psychological Review and American Psychologist.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.