Richard M. Merrill
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 0.5%
- Genetics top 2%
- Nature and Landscape Conservation top 5%
- Insect Science top 2%
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 10%
- Co-authors
- Chris D. JigginsW. Owen McMillanStephen H. MontgomeryJoseph A. TobiasNathalie SeddonJames MalletJohn W. DaveyRichard W. R. Wallbank
- Topics
- Plant and animal studies (31 papers)Animal Behavior and Reproduction (20 papers)Lepidoptera: Biology and Taxonomy (14 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomGermanyPanama
In The Last Decade
Richard M. Merrill
42 papers receiving 1.6k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 1.1k
- Genetics 1.0k
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 247
- Insect Science 242
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 231
Countries citing papers authored by Richard M. Merrill
This map shows the geographic impact of Richard M. Merrill's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard M. Merrill with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard M. Merrill more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Richard M. Merrill
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard M. Merrill. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard M. Merrill. The network helps show where Richard M. Merrill may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Richard M. Merrill
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Richard M. Merrill. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Richard M. Merrill based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Richard M. Merrill. Richard M. Merrill is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 20 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | 16 | |
| 9 | 31 | |
| 10 | 11 | |
| 11 | 11 | |
| 12 | 16 | |
| 13 | 13 | |
| 14 | 29 | |
| 15 | 27 | |
| 16 | 48 | |
| 17 | 102 | |
| 18 | 7 | |
| 19 | 12 | |
| 20 | 141 |
About Richard M. Merrill
Richard M. Merrill is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Genetics and Developmental Biology, having authored 43 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant and animal studies (31 papers), Animal Behavior and Reproduction (20 papers) and Lepidoptera: Biology and Taxonomy (14 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (1.1k citations), Genetics (1.0k citations) and Ecological Modeling (134 citations). Richard M. Merrill has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Germany and Panama. Frequent co-authors include Chris D. Jiggins, W. Owen McMillan, Stephen H. Montgomery, Joseph A. Tobias, Nathalie Seddon, James Mallet, John W. Davey, Richard W. R. Wallbank, Camilo Salazar and Nicola J. Nadeau. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, Science and Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.