Anne C. Gaskett

2.1k total citations
54 papers, 1.5k citations indexed

About

Anne C. Gaskett is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Genetics and Plant Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Anne C. Gaskett has authored 54 papers receiving a total of 1.5k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 38 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, 16 papers in Genetics and 16 papers in Plant Science. Recurrent topics in Anne C. Gaskett's work include Plant and animal studies (30 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (16 papers) and Animal Behavior and Reproduction (13 papers). Anne C. Gaskett is often cited by papers focused on Plant and animal studies (30 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (16 papers) and Animal Behavior and Reproduction (13 papers). Anne C. Gaskett collaborates with scholars based in New Zealand, Australia and United States. Anne C. Gaskett's co-authors include Marie E. Herberstein, Mark A. Elgar, Matthew R. Goddard, Jacqueline R. Beggs, Richard D. Newcomb, Jamie R. Stavert, David E. Pattemore, Barbara J. Downes, Ígnasi Bartomeus and Catrin S. Günther and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Ecology and Scientific Reports.

In The Last Decade

Anne C. Gaskett

49 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Anne C. Gaskett New Zealand 21 1.1k 581 415 312 272 54 1.5k
Renee M. Borges India 27 1.5k 1.4× 754 1.3× 851 2.1× 528 1.7× 423 1.6× 107 2.0k
Magne Friberg Sweden 26 1.5k 1.4× 806 1.4× 520 1.3× 350 1.1× 498 1.8× 77 2.0k
Casper J. van der Kooi Netherlands 19 976 0.9× 302 0.5× 611 1.5× 345 1.1× 138 0.5× 42 1.4k
Mani Shrestha Australia 24 1.0k 0.9× 304 0.5× 564 1.4× 331 1.1× 305 1.1× 54 1.3k
Amy P. Hastings United States 17 773 0.7× 258 0.4× 516 1.2× 444 1.4× 384 1.4× 37 1.4k
Francesca Barbero Italy 23 869 0.8× 825 1.4× 230 0.6× 370 1.2× 229 0.8× 72 1.4k
Santiago R. Ramírez United States 24 1.4k 1.3× 754 1.3× 487 1.2× 776 2.5× 173 0.6× 68 1.7k
Tamar Keasar Israel 22 1.0k 0.9× 414 0.7× 525 1.3× 669 2.1× 190 0.7× 91 1.4k
Magali Proffit France 22 1.0k 0.9× 201 0.3× 902 2.2× 632 2.0× 315 1.2× 42 1.5k
William J. Etges United States 29 1.3k 1.2× 1.4k 2.3× 232 0.6× 992 3.2× 254 0.9× 74 2.3k

Countries citing papers authored by Anne C. Gaskett

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anne C. Gaskett's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anne C. Gaskett with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anne C. Gaskett more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anne C. Gaskett

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anne C. Gaskett. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anne C. Gaskett. The network helps show where Anne C. Gaskett may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anne C. Gaskett

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anne C. Gaskett. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anne C. Gaskett based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Anne C. Gaskett. Anne C. Gaskett is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Rayner, Matt J., et al.. (2025). Clear-white plastics are most common in global oceans and seabird stomachs, but local species can ingest specific colours. Marine Pollution Bulletin. 215. 117827–117827.
2.
Gaskett, Anne C., et al.. (2024). Bryo-zoophily: a new look at the ecology of moss and animal interactions. New Zealand Journal of Botany. 63(5). 2275–2299. 1 indexed citations
3.
Gaskett, Anne C., et al.. (2024). Floral morphology is associated with pollen deposition patterns on moth bodies. Austral Ecology. 49(11).
4.
Gaskett, Anne C., et al.. (2023). Passage of spores of the dung moss Tayloria callophylla (Splachnaceae) through an avian digestive tract—a novel mode of dispersal?. Bryophyte Diversity and Evolution. 46(1). 168–173. 2 indexed citations
5.
O’Hanlon, James C., et al.. (2022). Are some species ‘robust’ to exploitation? Explaining persistence in deceptive relationships. Evolutionary Ecology. 36(3). 321–339. 2 indexed citations
6.
Gaskett, Anne C., et al.. (2021). Museum records indicate male bias in pollinators of sexually deceptive orchids. Die Naturwissenschaften. 108(4). 25–25. 7 indexed citations
8.
Callahan, Damien L., et al.. (2019). Combining Evolutionary Inference and Metabolomics to Identify Plants With Medicinal Potential. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution. 7. 33 indexed citations
9.
Gaskett, Anne C., et al.. (2017). Feather colours of live birds and museum specimens look similar when viewed by seabirds. Ibis. 160(1). 185–189. 1 indexed citations
10.
Stavert, Jamie R., David E. Pattemore, Anne C. Gaskett, Jacqueline R. Beggs, & Ígnasi Bartomeus. (2017). Exotic species enhance response diversity to land-use change but modify functional composition. Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences. 284(1860). 20170788–20170788. 26 indexed citations
11.
Beggs, Jacqueline R., et al.. (2016). Flowers, phenology and pollination of the endemic New Zealand greenhood orchid Pterostylis brumalis. New Zealand Journal of Botany. 54(3). 291–310. 11 indexed citations
12.
Gaskett, Anne C., John A. Endler, & Ryan D. Phillips. (2016). Convergent evolution of sexual deception via chromatic and achromatic contrast rather than colour mimicry. Evolutionary Ecology. 31(2). 205–227. 20 indexed citations
13.
Stavert, Jamie R., Anne C. Gaskett, David J. Scott, & Jacqueline R. Beggs. (2014). Dung beetles in an avian-dominated island ecosystem: feeding and trophic ecology. Oecologia. 176(1). 259–271. 16 indexed citations
14.
Newcomb, Richard D., et al.. (2014). Niche construction initiates the evolution of mutualistic interactions. Ecology Letters. 17(10). 1257–1264. 105 indexed citations
15.
Gaskett, Anne C., et al.. (2013). Pollination and insect visitors to the putatively brood‐site deceptive endemic spurred helmet orchid, Corybas cheesemanii. New Zealand Journal of Botany. 51(3). 155–167. 14 indexed citations
16.
Gaskett, Anne C., et al.. (2013). Quantifying Variation in the Ability of Yeasts to Attract Drosophila melanogaster. PLoS ONE. 8(9). e75332–e75332. 87 indexed citations
17.
Gaskett, Anne C.. (2012). Floral shape mimicry and variation in sexually deceptive orchids with a shared pollinator. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. 106(3). 469–481. 30 indexed citations
18.
Gaskett, Anne C.. (2010). Orchid pollination by sexual deception: pollinator perspectives. Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society. 86(1). 33–75. 187 indexed citations
19.
Gaskett, Anne C., Claire Winnick, & Marie E. Herberstein. (2008). Orchid Sexual Deceit Provokes Ejaculation. The American Naturalist. 171(6). E206–E212. 42 indexed citations
20.
Gaskett, Anne C., Cathy Bulman, Xi He, & Simon Goldsworthy. (2001). Diet composition and guild structure of mesopelagic and bathypelagic fishes near Macquarie Island, Australia. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research. 35(3). 469–476. 49 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026