Camilo Salazar

9.8k total citations · 1 hit paper
73 papers, 3.7k citations indexed

About

Camilo Salazar is a scholar working on Genetics, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Insect Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Camilo Salazar has authored 73 papers receiving a total of 3.7k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 56 papers in Genetics, 47 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and 11 papers in Insect Science. Recurrent topics in Camilo Salazar's work include Plant and animal studies (44 papers), Genetic diversity and population structure (35 papers) and Lepidoptera: Biology and Taxonomy (33 papers). Camilo Salazar is often cited by papers focused on Plant and animal studies (44 papers), Genetic diversity and population structure (35 papers) and Lepidoptera: Biology and Taxonomy (33 papers). Camilo Salazar collaborates with scholars based in Colombia, United Kingdom and Panama. Camilo Salazar's co-authors include Chris D. Jiggins, Mauricio Linares, Simon H. Martin, Carolina Pardo‐Díaz, James Mallet, W. Owen McMillan, Eldredge Bermingham, Nicola J. Nadeau, Jesús Mavárez and Kanchon K. Dasmahapatra and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, Science and Nature Communications.

In The Last Decade

Camilo Salazar

71 papers receiving 3.7k citations

Hit Papers

Genome-wide evidence for speciation with gene flow in Hel... 2013 2026 2017 2021 2013 100 200 300 400

Peers

Camilo Salazar
Simon H. Martin United Kingdom
Karl M. Kjer United States
Andreas Zwick Australia
James D. Fry United States
Jesse N. Weber United States
Camilo Salazar
Citations per year, relative to Camilo Salazar Camilo Salazar (= 1×) peers Kanchon K. Dasmahapatra

Countries citing papers authored by Camilo Salazar

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Camilo Salazar's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Camilo Salazar with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Camilo Salazar more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Camilo Salazar

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Camilo Salazar. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Camilo Salazar. The network helps show where Camilo Salazar may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Camilo Salazar

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Camilo Salazar. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Camilo Salazar based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Camilo Salazar. Camilo Salazar is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Pardo‐Díaz, Carolina, et al.. (2024). Weighting of sensory cues reflect changing patterns of visual investment during ecological divergence in Heliconius butterflies. Biology Letters. 20(10). 20240377–20240377. 2 indexed citations
2.
Alcamí, Pepe, Steven M. Van Belleghem, Chi‐Yun Kuo, et al.. (2024). Adaptive introgression of a visual preference gene. Science. 383(6689). 1368–1373. 20 indexed citations
3.
Pardo‐Díaz, Carolina, Gabriela Montejo‐Kovacevich, W. Owen McMillan, et al.. (2024). Genomic evidence reveals three W-autosome fusions in Heliconius butterflies. PLoS Genetics. 20(7). e1011318–e1011318. 2 indexed citations
4.
Kuo, Chi‐Yun, et al.. (2023). Does sexual conflict contribute to the evolution of novel warning patterns?. Journal of Evolutionary Biology. 36(3). 563–578. 3 indexed citations
5.
Cara, M., Paul Jay, Quentin Rougemont, et al.. (2023). Balancing selection at a wing pattern locus is associated with major shifts in genome-wide patterns of diversity and gene flow. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 3. 1 indexed citations
6.
Montejo‐Kovacevich, Gabriela, Joana I. Meier, Caroline Bacquet, et al.. (2022). Repeated genetic adaptation to altitude in two tropical butterflies. Nature Communications. 13(1). 4676–4676. 28 indexed citations
7.
Kuo, Chi‐Yun, et al.. (2021). Light environment influences mating behaviours during the early stages of divergence in tropical butterflies. Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences. 288(1947). 20210157–20210157. 16 indexed citations
8.
Darragh, Kathy, Mauricio Linares, Stefan Schulz, et al.. (2020). Chemical signals act as the main reproductive barrier between sister and mimetic Heliconius butterflies. Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences. 287(1926). 20200587–20200587. 29 indexed citations
9.
Belleghem, Steven M. Van, Jennifer James, Camilo Salazar, et al.. (2020). Selective sweeps on novel and introgressed variation shape mimicry loci in a butterfly adaptive radiation. PLoS Biology. 18(2). e3000597–e3000597. 47 indexed citations
10.
Darragh, Kathy, Gabriela Montejo‐Kovacevich, Krzysztof M. Kozak, et al.. (2020). Species specificity and intraspecific variation in the chemical profiles of Heliconius butterflies across a large geographic range. Ecology and Evolution. 10(9). 3895–3918. 29 indexed citations
11.
Stankowski, Sean, et al.. (2020). Müllerian mimicry of a quantitative trait despite contrasting levels of genomic divergence and selection. Molecular Ecology. 29(11). 2016–2030. 5 indexed citations
12.
Clerici, Nicola, Camilo Salazar, Carolina Pardo‐Díaz, et al.. (2018). Peace in Colombia is a critical moment for Neotropical connectivity and conservation: Save the northern Andes–Amazon biodiversity bridge. Conservation Letters. 12(1). 63 indexed citations
13.
Belleghem, Steven M. Van, Margarita Baquero, Riccardo Papa, et al.. (2018). Patterns of Z chromosome divergence among Heliconius species highlight the importance of historical demography. Molecular Ecology. 27(19). 3852–3872. 50 indexed citations
14.
Pardo‐Díaz, Carolina, Simon H. Martin, Carlos F. Arias, et al.. (2017). Evolution of novel mimicry rings facilitated by adaptive introgression in tropical butterflies. Molecular Ecology. 26(19). 5160–5172. 51 indexed citations
15.
Belleghem, Steven M. Van, Pasi Rastas, Alexie Papanicolaou, et al.. (2017). Complex modular architecture around a simple toolkit of wing pattern genes. Nature Ecology & Evolution. 1(3). 52–52. 132 indexed citations
16.
Rosser, Neil, Kanchon K. Dasmahapatra, Mauricio Linares, et al.. (2017). The Scent Chemistry of Heliconius Wing Androconia. Journal of Chemical Ecology. 43(9). 843–857. 28 indexed citations
17.
Mérot, Claire, Camilo Salazar, Richard M. Merrill, Chris D. Jiggins, & Mathieu Joron. (2017). What shapes the continuum of reproductive isolation? Lessons from Heliconius butterflies. Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences. 284(1856). 20170335–20170335. 48 indexed citations
18.
Martin, Simon H., Markus Möst, William J. Palmer, et al.. (2016). Natural Selection and Genetic Diversity in the Butterfly Heliconius melpomene. Genetics. 203(1). 525–541. 65 indexed citations
19.
Martin, Simon H., Kanchon K. Dasmahapatra, Nicola J. Nadeau, et al.. (2013). Genome-wide evidence for speciation with gene flow in Heliconius butterflies. LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas). 32 indexed citations
20.
Salazar, Camilo, et al.. (2010). Multiple sources of reproductive isolation in a bimodal butterfly hybrid zone. Journal of Evolutionary Biology. 23(6). 1312–1320. 43 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026