Richard Koebner

415 citations
9 papers · 94 · h-index 4

Impact in

  • History top 5%
    • European Political History Analysis
    • Reformation and Early Modern Christianity
    • Scottish History and National Identity
    • Medieval Literature and History

Papers in

Richard Koebner

5 papers receiving 60 citations

Peers

Richard Koebner
Comparison fields: 5 of 27
  • History 35
  • Classics 11
  • Political Science and International Relations 36
  • Museology 5
  • Sociology and Political Science 39
Replace Edward Surtz with:
Edward Surtz United States
Folger Shakespeare Library
John F. H. New United States
Robert R. Rea United States
Harold Hulme
Edward Benson Switzerland
David Harris Willson
Howard Erskine‐Hill United Kingdom
Geoffrey F. Nuttall United Kingdom
William Lamont United Kingdom
Richard Koebner relative to Edward Surtz United States Edward Surtz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Edward Surtz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Richard Koebner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Richard Koebner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard Koebner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard Koebner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Richard Koebner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard Koebner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard Koebner. The network helps show where Richard Koebner may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 3 scholars most cited alongside Richard Koebner, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Richard Koebner Line = papers co-authored together Richard Koebner links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
#Work
1 196544
2 195127
3 195313
4
Venantius Fortunatus : seine Persönlichkeit und seine Stellung in der geistigen Kultur des Merowinger-Reiches
19737
5 19522
6
Studies in medieval and modern thought and literature
19551
7 20190
8 19570
9 19570

About Richard Koebner

Richard Koebner is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, History, Classics, Anthropology and Language and Linguistics, having authored 9 papers that have together received 94 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Medieval Literature and History (1 paper), European Political History Analysis (1 paper), European history and politics (1 paper), Classical Antiquity Studies (1 paper), Linguistics and language evolution (1 paper), German History and Society (1 paper), Intelligence, Security, War Strategy (1 paper) and Political Theory and Influence (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in History (35 citations), Classics (11 citations), Political Science and International Relations (36 citations), Museology (5 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (39 citations). Richard Koebner has collaborated with scholars based in Israel. Frequent co-authors include John S. Galbraith, Rosa Luxemburg and Joseph A. Schumpeter. Their work appears in journals such as Historical Research, Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes, The American Historical Review, The Economic History Review and Israel Journal of Foreign Affairs.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact