631 total citations 17 papers, 115 citations indexed
About
Folger Shakespeare Library is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Music and Museology.
According to data from OpenAlex, Folger Shakespeare Library has authored 17 papers receiving a total of 115 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Literature and Literary Theory, 4 papers in Music and 3 papers in Museology. Recurrent topics in Folger Shakespeare Library's work include Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (6 papers), Historical Art and Culture Studies (3 papers) and Theater, Performance, and Music History (3 papers). Folger Shakespeare Library is often cited by papers focused on Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (6 papers), Historical Art and Culture Studies (3 papers) and Theater, Performance, and Music History (3 papers). Folger Shakespeare Library collaborates with scholars based in . Folger Shakespeare Library's co-authors include Charlton Hinman, William Shakespeare, Thomas Smith, William Stafford, Dennis O. Flynn, John Donne, Jessie Ann Owens, Marianne Hester, Jason Peacey and British Library and has published in prestigious journals such as Medical Entomology and Zoology and W.W. Norton eBooks.
Citations per year, relative to Folger Shakespeare Library Folger Shakespeare Library (= 1×)
peers
F. J. Levy
Countries citing papers authored by Folger Shakespeare Library
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Folger Shakespeare Library's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Folger Shakespeare Library with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Folger Shakespeare Library more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Folger Shakespeare Library
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Folger Shakespeare Library. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Folger Shakespeare Library. The network helps show where Folger Shakespeare Library may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Folger Shakespeare Library
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Folger Shakespeare Library.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Folger Shakespeare Library based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Folger Shakespeare Library. Folger Shakespeare Library is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
17 of 17 papers shown
1.
Smith, Thomas, et al.. (2010). A Discourse of the Common Weal of This Realm of England.13 indexed citations
2.
Peacey, Jason, et al.. (2008). Breaking News: Renaissance Journalism and the Birth of the Newspaper. Medical Entomology and Zoology.2 indexed citations
3.
Owens, Jessie Ann & Folger Shakespeare Library. (2006). "Noyses, sounds, and sweet aires" : music in early modern England. Medical Entomology and Zoology.2 indexed citations
4.
Donne, John, et al.. (2005). John Donne's marriage letters in The Folger Shakespeare Library. Medical Entomology and Zoology.3 indexed citations
5.
Library, Folger Shakespeare. (2000). Fooles and Fricassees: Food in Shakespeare's England.1 indexed citations
6.
Shakespeare, William, Charlton Hinman, Folger Shakespeare Library, & Peter W. M. Blayney. (1996). The first folio of Shakespeare ; based on folios in the Folger Shakespeare Library collection. W.W. Norton eBooks.
7.
Library, Folger Shakespeare, et al.. (1993). New World of Wonders: European Images of the Americas, 1492-1700. Medical Entomology and Zoology.10 indexed citations
8.
Library, Folger Shakespeare, et al.. (1993). A Catalogue of Paintings in the Folger Shakespeare Library: "As Imagination Bodies Forth". Medical Entomology and Zoology.4 indexed citations
9.
Maccubbin, Robert P., et al.. (1990). The Age of William III & Mary II: Power, Politics and Patronage, 1688-1702 : A Reference Encyclopedia and Exhibition Catalogue. Medical Entomology and Zoology.2 indexed citations
10.
Library, British, et al.. (1988). Queen Elizabeth's wardrobe unlock'd : the inventories of the Wardrobe of Robes prepared in July 1600 : edited from Stowe MS 557 in the British Library, MSLR 2/121 in the Public Record Office, London, and MS V.b.72 in the Folger Shakespeare Library, Washington DC.1 indexed citations
11.
Library, Folger Shakespeare, et al.. (1976). The widening circle : the story of the Folger Shakespeare Library and its collections. Medical Entomology and Zoology.
12.
Library, Folger Shakespeare, et al.. (1976). Shakespeare on the American stage. Medical Entomology and Zoology.2 indexed citations
13.
Library, Folger Shakespeare, et al.. (1970). "Gaping Gulf" with Letters and Other Relevant Documents. Medical Entomology and Zoology.3 indexed citations
14.
Library, Folger Shakespeare, et al.. (1969). The case of the Commonwealth of England, stated. Medical Entomology and Zoology.27 indexed citations
15.
Shakespeare, William, Charlton Hinman, & Folger Shakespeare Library. (1968). The first folio of Shakespeare.33 indexed citations
16.
Library, Folger Shakespeare, et al.. (1966). Of the Rus commonwealth. Medical Entomology and Zoology.1 indexed citations
17.
Library, Folger Shakespeare, et al.. (1962). The complete gentleman ; the truth of our times ; and The art of living in London. Medical Entomology and Zoology.11 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.