Richard I. Frederick

899 total citations
25 papers, 533 citations indexed

About

Richard I. Frederick is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Epidemiology and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Richard I. Frederick has authored 25 papers receiving a total of 533 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Clinical Psychology, 7 papers in Epidemiology and 4 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Richard I. Frederick's work include Traumatic Brain Injury Research (7 papers), Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (6 papers) and Deception detection and forensic psychology (4 papers). Richard I. Frederick is often cited by papers focused on Traumatic Brain Injury Research (7 papers), Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (6 papers) and Deception detection and forensic psychology (4 papers). Richard I. Frederick collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Nigeria. Richard I. Frederick's co-authors include Hilliard G. Foster, Jeffrey Powel, Thomas Grisso, Stephen C. Bowden, Ross D. Crosby, F. M. Speed, Michael J. Carter, Robert L. Denney, Scott D. Bender and David R. Strong and has published in prestigious journals such as Psychological Assessment, Neuropsychology and Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology.

In The Last Decade

Richard I. Frederick

25 papers receiving 470 citations

Peers

Richard I. Frederick
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
  • Epidemiology 301
  • Clinical Psychology 214
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 116
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 95
  • Social Psychology 94
Replace David M. Glassmire with:
David M. Glassmire United States
Julie K. Lynch United States
Cheryl K. Hiscock United States
Brechje Dandachi‐FitzGerald Netherlands
David R. Cox United States
Anna S. Ord United States
Paul B. Ingram United States
Irena Bošković Netherlands
Zachary C. Merz United States
Arthur Vogt Switzerland
David M. Glassmire United States View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Richard I. Frederick
Richard I. Frederick · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Richard I. Frederick
Richard I. Frederick · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Richard I. Frederick

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Richard I. Frederick's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard I. Frederick with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard I. Frederick more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Richard I. Frederick

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard I. Frederick. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard I. Frederick. The network helps show where Richard I. Frederick may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Richard I. Frederick

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Richard I. Frederick. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Richard I. Frederick based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Richard I. Frederick. Richard I. Frederick is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 11
2 12
3 1
4 11
5 20
6 24
7 40
8 4
9 16
10 40
11 12
12 67
13 2
14 1
15 26
16 15
17 34
18 61
19 5
20 60

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026