Robert L. Denney

1.2k total citations
39 papers, 729 citations indexed

About

Robert L. Denney is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Social Psychology and Clinical Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Robert L. Denney has authored 39 papers receiving a total of 729 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 24 papers in Epidemiology, 13 papers in Social Psychology and 13 papers in Clinical Psychology. Recurrent topics in Robert L. Denney's work include Traumatic Brain Injury Research (24 papers), Deception detection and forensic psychology (7 papers) and Counseling Practices and Supervision (6 papers). Robert L. Denney is often cited by papers focused on Traumatic Brain Injury Research (24 papers), Deception detection and forensic psychology (7 papers) and Counseling Practices and Supervision (6 papers). Robert L. Denney collaborates with scholars based in United States and Canada. Robert L. Denney's co-authors include Rachel L. Fazio, Ronald M. Ruff, Tresa Roebuck‐Spencer, Kevin J. Bianchini, Tannahill Glen, Antonio E. Puente, John H. Denning, Mary Connell, Shane S. Bush and Arthur Maerlender and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Interpersonal Violence, Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology and Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation.

In The Last Decade

Robert L. Denney

37 papers receiving 665 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Robert L. Denney United States 16 386 227 198 149 114 39 729
Brad L. Roper United States 17 305 0.8× 143 0.6× 241 1.2× 239 1.6× 108 0.9× 32 892
Charlene O’Connor Canada 13 214 0.6× 237 1.0× 149 0.8× 173 1.2× 49 0.4× 33 716
Douglas M. Whiteside United States 17 365 0.9× 286 1.3× 249 1.3× 250 1.7× 98 0.9× 46 1.0k
Rudi Coetzer United Kingdom 14 397 1.0× 314 1.4× 140 0.7× 88 0.6× 38 0.3× 55 690
Martin L. Rohling United States 9 616 1.6× 247 1.1× 245 1.2× 195 1.3× 90 0.8× 13 1.1k
Ieke Winkens Netherlands 17 360 0.9× 181 0.8× 568 2.9× 185 1.2× 61 0.5× 48 1.1k
Fiona M. Partridge New Zealand 10 329 0.9× 527 2.3× 274 1.4× 147 1.0× 93 0.8× 11 982
Thomas P. Ross United States 13 232 0.6× 86 0.4× 212 1.1× 197 1.3× 43 0.4× 23 715
Robert D. Shura United States 17 546 1.4× 297 1.3× 394 2.0× 173 1.2× 48 0.4× 70 1.2k
Connie Veazey United States 16 209 0.5× 414 1.8× 114 0.6× 98 0.7× 82 0.7× 21 1.1k

Countries citing papers authored by Robert L. Denney

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert L. Denney's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert L. Denney with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert L. Denney more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert L. Denney

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert L. Denney. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert L. Denney. The network helps show where Robert L. Denney may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Robert L. Denney

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Robert L. Denney. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Robert L. Denney based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Robert L. Denney. Robert L. Denney is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Denney, Robert L.. (2024). Constitutional and Judicial Foundations for Competency-Related Assessment in Criminal Forensic Neuropsychology. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology. 40(2). 245–255. 1 indexed citations
2.
Boone, Kyle B., Jerry J. Sweet, Desiree Byrd, et al.. (2022). Official position of the American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology on test security. The Clinical Neuropsychologist. 36(3). 523–545. 18 indexed citations
3.
Roebuck‐Spencer, Tresa, Tannahill Glen, Antonio E. Puente, et al.. (2017). Cognitive Screening Tests Versus Comprehensive Neuropsychological Test Batteries: A National Academy of Neuropsychology Education Paper†. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology. 32(4). 491–498. 132 indexed citations
4.
Denney, Robert L., et al.. (2016). Development of the Poor Validity Profile Analysis for the Medical Symptom Validity Test. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology. 31(8). 944–953. 3 indexed citations
5.
Denney, Robert L., et al.. (2016). Sandbagging on the Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing (ImPACT) in a high school athlete population. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology. 32(3). 259–266. 33 indexed citations
6.
Fazio, Rachel L., et al.. (2016). Effects of handcuffs on neuropsychological testing: Implications for criminal forensic evaluations. Applied Neuropsychology Adult. 25(1). 82–90. 1 indexed citations
7.
Fazio, Rachel L., John H. Denning, & Robert L. Denney. (2016). TOMM Trial 1 as a performance validity indicator in a criminal forensic sample. The Clinical Neuropsychologist. 31(1). 251–267. 48 indexed citations
8.
Fazio, Rachel L., et al.. (2015). Comparison of Performance of the Test of Memory Malingering and Word Memory Test in a Criminal Forensic Sample. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology. 30(4). 293–301. 16 indexed citations
9.
Denney, Robert L., et al.. (2014). Comparison of the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status Effort Scale and Effort Index in a Dementia Sample. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology. 29(7). 633–641. 15 indexed citations
10.
Fazio, Rachel L., et al.. (2011). The original instructions for the Edinburgh Handedness Inventory are misunderstood by a majority of participants. Laterality Asymmetries of Body Brain and Cognition. 17(1). 70–77. 29 indexed citations
11.
Denney, Robert L.. (2010). Authentic Professional Competence in Clinical Neuropsychology. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology. 25(5). 457–467. 2 indexed citations
12.
D’Amato, Claudia & Robert L. Denney. (2008). The diagnostic utility of the Rarely Missed Index of the Wechsler Memory Scale-Third Edition in detecting response bias in an adult male incarcerated setting☆. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology. 23(5). 553–561. 7 indexed citations
13.
Denney, Robert L., et al.. (2007). Base Rates of Negative Response Bias and Malingered Neurocognitive Dysfunction among Criminal Defendants Referred for Neuropsychological Evaluation. The Clinical Neuropsychologist. 21(6). 899–916. 124 indexed citations
14.
Denney, Robert L., et al.. (2006). The Relationship Between Trauma and Violence in a Jail Inmate Sample. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. 21(9). 1234–1241. 25 indexed citations
15.
Denney, Robert L., et al.. (2005). Review of Green's word memory test (WMT) for Windows.. 1 indexed citations
16.
Denney, Robert L., et al.. (2005). Testing the Trauma Model of Violence. Journal of Family Violence. 20(3). 151–159. 19 indexed citations
17.
Denney, Robert L.. (2003). Introduction. 3(4). 1–3.
18.
Denney, Robert L., et al.. (2001). Test reviews : Computerized assessment of response bias (CARB), Word Memory Test (WMT), and Memory Complaints Inventory (MCI). 2(1). 71–77. 1 indexed citations
19.
Denney, Robert L., et al.. (2000). Clinical Neuropsychology in the Criminal Forensic Setting. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation. 15(2). 804–828. 34 indexed citations
20.
Denney, Robert L.. (1996). Symptom validity testing of remote memory in a criminal forensic setting. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology. 11(7). 589–603. 40 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Brad L. Roper Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Charlene O’Connor Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Douglas M. Whiteside Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Rudi Coetzer Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Martin L. Rohling Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Ieke Winkens Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Fiona M. Partridge Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Thomas P. Ross Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Robert D. Shura Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Connie Veazey
Rankless by CCL
2026