Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Countries citing papers authored by Richard H. Day
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Richard H. Day's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard H. Day with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard H. Day more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard H. Day. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard H. Day. The network helps show where Richard H. Day may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Richard H. Day
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Richard H. Day.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Richard H. Day based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Richard H. Day. Richard H. Day is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Day, Richard H.. (2003). The Divergent Dynamics of Economic Growth. Cambridge University Press eBooks.1 indexed citations
7.
Day, Richard H.. (2001). Economics in the spirit of Minsky. Chapters.1 indexed citations
8.
Day, Richard H.. (2000). Complex Economic Dynamics - Vol. 2: An Introduction to Macroeconomic Dynamics. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics. 2.1 indexed citations
9.
Day, Richard H.. (1999). An introduction to macroeconomic dynamics. MIT Press eBooks.4 indexed citations
10.
Day, Richard H.. (1994). Complex Economic Dynamics - Vol. 1: An Introduction to Dynamical Systems and Market Mechanisms. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics. 1.2 indexed citations
11.
Day, Richard H.. (1994). Complex economic dynamics. MIT Press eBooks.128 indexed citations
12.
Day, Richard H.. (1994). An introduction to dynamical systems and market mechanisms. MIT Press eBooks.12 indexed citations
13.
Day, Richard H. & Ping Chen. (1993). Nonlinear dynamics and evolutionary economics. Oxford University Press eBooks.257 indexed citations
Day, Richard H., Industriens utredningsinstitut, & Gunnar Elíasson. (1986). The dynamics of market economies. Elsevier eBooks.35 indexed citations
16.
Day, Richard H., et al.. (1986). Erratic Dynamics in an Overlapping Generations Model. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics. 2. 1–16.1 indexed citations
17.
Day, Richard H.. (1982). Irregular Growth Cycles. American Economic Review. 72(3). 406–414.239 indexed citations
18.
Day, Richard H. & Geoffrey Shepherd. (1982). Economic analysis and agricultural policy.9 indexed citations
19.
Day, Richard H., Samuel A. Morley, & Kenneth R. Smith. (1974). Myopic Optimizing and Rules of Thumb in a Micro-Model of Industrial Growth. American Economic Review. 64(1). 11–23.21 indexed citations
20.
Day, Richard H. & Stephen M. Robinson. (1972). Mathematical topics in economic theory and computation. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics eBooks.29 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.