Richard Geers

559 total citations
20 papers, 409 citations indexed

About

Richard Geers is a scholar working on Rehabilitation, Neurology and Epidemiology. According to data from OpenAlex, Richard Geers has authored 20 papers receiving a total of 409 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 14 papers in Rehabilitation, 9 papers in Neurology and 5 papers in Epidemiology. Recurrent topics in Richard Geers's work include Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (14 papers), Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders (9 papers) and Acute Ischemic Stroke Management (5 papers). Richard Geers is often cited by papers focused on Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (14 papers), Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders (9 papers) and Acute Ischemic Stroke Management (5 papers). Richard Geers collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, Belgium and Germany. Richard Geers's co-authors include Henk A.M. Seelen, Annick Timmermans, Rob Smeets, Ryanne Lemmens, Wilbert Bakx, Herman Kingma, Stefan Winter, S.M.C. Rasquin, M. Soede and Yvonne Janssen‐Potten and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Journal of Biomechanics and IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

In The Last Decade

Richard Geers

19 papers receiving 394 citations

Peers

Richard Geers
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
  • Rehabilitation 253
  • Biomedical Engineering 123
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 116
  • Neurology 92
  • Epidemiology 60
Replace Nizan Friedman with:
Nizan Friedman United States
Lisa Tedesco Triccas Belgium
Lise Worthen‐Chaudhari United States
Ji-Yeong Lee South Korea
Ryanne Lemmens Netherlands
Patrick Wai-Hang Kwong Hong Kong
Irma Sterpi Italy
Takashi Takebayashi Japan
Nika Goljar Slovenia
Eun Joo Kim South Korea
Nizan Friedman United States View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Richard Geers
Richard Geers · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Richard Geers
Richard Geers · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Richard Geers

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Richard Geers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard Geers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard Geers more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Richard Geers

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard Geers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard Geers. The network helps show where Richard Geers may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Richard Geers

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Richard Geers. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Richard Geers based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Richard Geers. Richard Geers is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 2
2 2
3 0
4 7
5 30
6
Comparing results of four decision support software tools on mains replacement
1
7 43
8 84
9 9
10 4
11 41
12 6
13 11
14 10
15 66
16 26
17 22
18 3
19 38
20
Nutritional studies with randomized butter. Cholesteremic effects of butter-oil and randomized butter-oil man [proceedings].
4

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026