Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
SENSE AND THE SINGLE NEURON: Probing the Physiology of Perception
This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew Parker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew Parker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew Parker more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew Parker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew Parker. The network helps show where Andrew Parker may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Andrew Parker
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Andrew Parker.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Andrew Parker based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Andrew Parker. Andrew Parker is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Bridge, Holly, Stuart Clare, Mark Jenkinson, et al.. (2005). Independent anatomical and functional measures of the V1/V2 boundary in human visual cortex.. Journal of Visualization. 5. 93–102.41 indexed citations
Krug, Kristine, Bruce G. Cumming, & Andrew Parker. (2000). The role of single MT (v5) neurons in stereo perception in the awake macaque. European Journal of Neuroscience. 12. 285–285.6 indexed citations
11.
Cumming, Bruce G. & Andrew Parker. (1998). Vergence eye movements explain some aspects of contextual modulation in primate V1. Perception. 27. 20–20.9 indexed citations
12.
Parker, Andrew & Bruce G. Cumming. (1996). Local vs global stereoscopic matching in neurons of cortical area V1. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 37. 1959–1959.2 indexed citations
13.
Harris, Julie M. & Andrew Parker. (1993). INDEPENDENT STEREOSCOPIC PROCESSING FOR SIGNALS OF DIFFERENT CONTRAST POLARITY. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 34. 1437–1437.7 indexed citations
14.
Cumming, Bruce G. & Andrew Parker. (1992). DETECTION OF STEREOSCOPIC MOTION IN DEPTH. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 33. 1333–1333.3 indexed citations
15.
Harris, Julie M. & Andrew Parker. (1992). COMPARING THE EFFICIENCY OF HUMAN STEREOPSIS WITH THAT OF A STEREO-ALGORITHM. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 33. 707–707.1 indexed citations
16.
Harris, Julie M. & Andrew Parker. (1991). IMPORTANCE OF DEPTH EDGES TO EFFICIENCY OF STEREOPSIS. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 32. 709–709.3 indexed citations
17.
Mansfield, J. Stephen & Andrew Parker. (1991). ORIENTATION TUNED MASKING OF STEREOPSIS. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 32. 710–710.2 indexed citations
18.
Hawken, Michael J., et al.. (1988). HUMAN CONTRAST THRESHOLDS FOR A STEREOSCOPIC DEPTH-DISCRIMINATION TASK ARE NO HIGHER THAN THOSE FOR SIMPLE MONOCULAR DETECTION. The Journal of Physiology. 396.2 indexed citations
19.
Parker, Andrew, et al.. (1988). SPATIAL PROPERTIES OF STEREO DISPARITY POOLING IN HUMAN-VISION. The Journal of Physiology. 396.1 indexed citations
20.
Parker, Andrew. (1980). THE SPATIAL-FREQUENCY TUNING OF VISUAL AFTEREFFECTS. Experimental Brain Research. 41.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.