Faruque Ghanchi
- Ophthalmology top 0.5%
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging top 2%
- Molecular Biology
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
- Rheumatology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Winfried M. K. AmoakuRichard GaleYit C. YangJames TalksBjörn RembackenSobha SivaprasadGordon N. DuttonAndrew Lotery
- Topics
- Retinal Diseases and Treatments (35 papers)Retinal Imaging and Analysis (31 papers)Retinal and Optic Conditions (29 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomGermanyFrance
In The Last Decade
Faruque Ghanchi
47 papers receiving 1.1k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
- Ophthalmology 854
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 629
- Molecular Biology 167
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 114
- Rheumatology 89
Countries citing papers authored by Faruque Ghanchi
This map shows the geographic impact of Faruque Ghanchi's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Faruque Ghanchi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Faruque Ghanchi more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Faruque Ghanchi
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Faruque Ghanchi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Faruque Ghanchi. The network helps show where Faruque Ghanchi may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Faruque Ghanchi
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Faruque Ghanchi. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Faruque Ghanchi based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Faruque Ghanchi. Faruque Ghanchi is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 6 | |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | 25 | |
| 10 | 11 | |
| 11 | 7 | |
| 12 | 2 | |
| 13 | 21 | |
| 14 | 8 | |
| 15 | Acceptability of OCT angiography: A multicentre OCT Angiography NEtwork (OCTANE) study | 1 |
| 16 | 4 | |
| 17 | 33 | |
| 18 | Defining response to anti-VEGF therapies in neovascular AMDbreakdown → | 262 |
| 19 | 10 | |
| 20 | 36 |
About Faruque Ghanchi
Faruque Ghanchi is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Nephrology, having authored 50 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Retinal Diseases and Treatments (35 papers), Retinal Imaging and Analysis (31 papers) and Retinal and Optic Conditions (29 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (854 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (629 citations) and Rheumatology (89 citations). Faruque Ghanchi has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Germany and France. Frequent co-authors include Winfried M. K. Amoaku, Richard Gale, Yit C. Yang, James Talks, Björn Rembacken, Sobha Sivaprasad, Gordon N. Dutton, Andrew Lotery, Simon Harding and Sajjad Mahmood. Their work appears in journals such as The Lancet, Ophthalmology and Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.