Countries citing papers authored by Richard G. Hamermesh
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Richard G. Hamermesh's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard G. Hamermesh with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard G. Hamermesh more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Richard G. Hamermesh
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard G. Hamermesh. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard G. Hamermesh. The network helps show where Richard G. Hamermesh may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Richard G. Hamermesh
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Richard G. Hamermesh.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Richard G. Hamermesh based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Richard G. Hamermesh. Richard G. Hamermesh is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Hamermesh, Richard G., et al.. (2019). Dementia Discovery Fund.1 indexed citations
2.
Hamermesh, Richard G., et al.. (2017). Intermountain Healthcare: Pursuing Precision Medicine.1 indexed citations
3.
Hamermesh, Richard G., et al.. (2016). One Obstacle to Curing Cancer: Patient Data Isn't Shared.1 indexed citations
4.
Hamermesh, Richard G., et al.. (2016). Neurotrack and the Alzheimer's Puzzle.1 indexed citations
5.
Hamermesh, Richard G., et al.. (2011). Gene Sequencing: Staking a Position in an Expanding Industry. SSRN Electronic Journal.2 indexed citations
6.
Hamermesh, Richard G., et al.. (2011). eHealthpoint: Healthcare for Rural India.1 indexed citations
7.
Hamermesh, Richard G., et al.. (2007). Realizing the promise of personalized medicine.. PubMed. 85(10). 108–17, 165.111 indexed citations
8.
Hamermesh, Richard G., Josh Lerner, & David Kiron. (2007). Technology Transfer at U.S. Universities.1 indexed citations
9.
Hamermesh, Richard G., et al.. (2006). Corporate Venture Capital at Eli Lilly (TN).
10.
Hamermesh, Richard G., James L. Heskett, & Michael J. Roberts. (2005). A Note on Managing the Growing Venture.6 indexed citations
11.
Hamermesh, Richard G., et al.. (2002). Note on Business Model Analysis for the Entrepreneur.13 indexed citations
12.
Hamermesh, Richard G.. (1995). Planeación estratégica: o cómo se las arreglan los gerentes triunfadores. 278–278.
Hamermesh, Richard G., et al.. (1980). Cómo competir en sectores económicos estancados. Harvard-Deusto business review. 119–130.1 indexed citations
18.
Hamermesh, Richard G., et al.. (1978). Strategies for low market share business Stratégies adaptées aux entreprises ayant une faible part de marché. Harvard business review. 56(3). 95–102.50 indexed citations
19.
Hamermesh, Richard G.. (1976). The corporate response to divisional profit crises. University Microfilms International eBooks.3 indexed citations
20.
Bower, Joseph L. & Richard G. Hamermesh. (1974). Federated Department Stores.4 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.