Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Developing a National Index of Subjective Wellbeing: The Australian Unity Wellbeing Index
2003745 citationsRobert A. Cummins, Richard Eckersley et al.Social Indicators Researchprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Richard Eckersley
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Richard Eckersley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard Eckersley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard Eckersley more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Richard Eckersley
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard Eckersley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard Eckersley. The network helps show where Richard Eckersley may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Richard Eckersley
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Richard Eckersley.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Richard Eckersley based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Richard Eckersley. Richard Eckersley is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Eckersley, Richard. (2008). Values and Visions: Youth and the Failure of Modern Western Culture. Youth studies Australia. 27(3). 10–19.8 indexed citations
6.
Eckersley, Richard. (2008). Wretched or Contented? The Politics of Past Life. Journal of futures studies. 13(2). 87–91.2 indexed citations
Eckersley, Richard, et al.. (2006). Success and wellbeing: A preview of the Australia 21 report on young people's wellbeing. Youth studies Australia. 25(1). 10.7 indexed citations
10.
Eckersley, Richard. (2006). Cultural dimensions of youth suicide. ANU Open Research (Australian National University).1 indexed citations
Cummins, Robert A., et al.. (2004). Australian Unity Wellbeing Index survey 10 : Report 10.0 : The wellbeing of Australians - health and body weight. Deakin Research Online (Deakin University). 52(3). 529–36.4 indexed citations
13.
Eckersley, Richard. (2004). Separate selves, tribal ties, and other stories. Family matters.2 indexed citations
14.
Eckersley, Richard. (2004). Opinion: Separate Selves, Tribal Ties and Other Stories: Making Sense of Different Accounts of Youth. Family matters. 36.3 indexed citations
15.
Eckersley, Richard. (2002). Health, wellbeing, and progress. New South Wales Public Health Bulletin. 13(6). 128–128.6 indexed citations
16.
Christoff, Peter, et al.. (2001). Green Thinking - from Australia. Environmental Politics. 10(4).1 indexed citations
17.
Eckersley, Richard. (1999). What the !#&* have values got to do with anything! Young people, youth culture and well-being. Social alternatives.1 indexed citations
18.
Eckersley, Richard. (1998). It's all news: making and remaking the myths of youth. Youth studies Australia. 17(1).2 indexed citations
Eckersley, Richard. (1996). Dreams and expectations: young Australians' views of the future. Youth studies Australia. 15(3). 11.7 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.