Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Social capital and health: A systematic review of systematic reviews
2019283 citationsAnnahita Ehsan, Dario Spini et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Dario Spini's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dario Spini with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dario Spini more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dario Spini. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dario Spini. The network helps show where Dario Spini may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Dario Spini
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Dario Spini.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Dario Spini based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Dario Spini. Dario Spini is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Eisner, Léïla, Felicity M. Turner‐Zwinkels, & Dario Spini. (2020). The Impact of Laws on Norms Perceptions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 47(7). 1071–1083.22 indexed citations
Spini, Dario, et al.. (2016). The multiplicity of aging: lessons for theory and conceptual development from longitudinal studies. IRIS.2 indexed citations
10.
Bernardi, Laura, et al.. (2015). Vulnerability as a heuristic for interdisciplinary research: Assessing the thematic and methodological structure of empirical life-course studies. SERVAL (Université de Lausanne).3 indexed citations
Morselli, Davide, et al.. (2013). Self- and interviewer-administered Life History Calendars. IRIS.1 indexed citations
13.
Elcheroth, Guy & Dario Spini. (2011). Political violence, intergroup conflict, and ethnic categories. IRIS.6 indexed citations
14.
Spini, Dario, et al.. (2007). Collective vulnerability, morality, and intergroup conflict: The beast, the angel and the madman. IRIS.2 indexed citations
15.
Spini, Dario & Willem Doise. (2005). Human Rights and Duties as Normative Social Representations.. IRIS.2 indexed citations
16.
Spini, Dario, et al.. (2004). L'héritage éclectique de Willem Doise : une introduction à la Festschrift. Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva).1 indexed citations
Pin, Stéphanie, Edith Guilley, Dario Spini, & Christian Lalive d’Épinay. (2003). Impact des relations sociales sur le maintien de l'indépendance durant la grande vieillesse: résultats d'une étude longitudinale suisse. Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva).1 indexed citations
19.
d’Épinay, Christian Lalive, et al.. (2000). Les relations familiales et amicales dans une cohorte d'octogénaires: une comparaison entre survivants et décédés après cinq ans d'étude. 58(2323). 2337–2343.1 indexed citations
20.
Spini, Dario. (1996). Structural equations with latent variables and social representations: comments on Carugati, Selleri and Scappini.. 5. 67–72.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.