Richard E. Faust

17 papers receiving 253 citations

Peers

Richard E. Faust
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Applied Psychology 29
  • Epidemiology 145
  • General Health Professions 81
  • Clinical Psychology 68
  • Pharmacology 44
Replace William J. Bukoski with:
William J. Bukoski United States
Michael Klitzner United States
Mark Hochhauser United States
Michael Coe United States
Vincent J. Nerviano United States
Iva Pejnović Franelić Croatia
Debby Allen United Kingdom
Amber M. Henslee United States
Ryan O'Mara United States
Miesha Marzell United States
Richard E. Faust relative to William J. Bukoski United States William J. Bukoski's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
William J. Bukoski · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Richard E. Faust

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Richard E. Faust's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard E. Faust with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard E. Faust more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Richard E. Faust

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard E. Faust. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard E. Faust. The network helps show where Richard E. Faust may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 10 scholars most cited alongside Richard E. Faust, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Richard E. Faust Line = papers co-authored together Richard E. Faust links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1974139
2 1976109
3 197626
4 196721
5 195810
6 19745
7 19715
8 19783
9 19973
10 19852
11 19782
12 19842
13 19651
14 19761
15 19551
16 19841
17 19801
18 19741
19 19860
20 19820

About Richard E. Faust

Richard E. Faust is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Geriatrics and Gerontology, Clinical Psychology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Social Psychology, having authored 22 papers that have together received 333 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (4 papers), Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy (3 papers), Innovation Policy and R&D (2 papers), Biotechnology and Related Fields (2 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (1 paper), Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation (1 paper), Capital Investment and Risk Analysis (1 paper) and Business Process Modeling and Analysis (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (29 citations), Epidemiology (145 citations), General Health Professions (81 citations), Clinical Psychology (68 citations) and Pharmacology (44 citations). Richard E. Faust has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Eric Single, Denise B. Kandel, David M. Treiman, Richard C. Anderson, Donald J. Treiman, Egil Ramstad, George L. Ackerman, Marcelo Soares Pimenta, Joseph A. Barone and John L. Colaizzi. Their work appears in journals such as Social Forces, American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, Perspectives in biology and medicine, Journal of Educational Psychology and Journal of Health and Social Behavior.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact