Richard C. Hatch
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics top 5%
- Materials Chemistry top 10%
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering
- Condensed Matter Physics top 5%
- Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials
- Co-authors
- Marco BianchiPhilip HofmannJianli MiBo B. IversenHartmut HöchstDandan GuanD. L. HùberAlexander A. Demkov
- Topics
- Graphene research and applications (7 papers)Electronic and Structural Properties of Oxides (7 papers)Topological Materials and Phenomena (7 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesDenmarkGermany
In The Last Decade
Richard C. Hatch
22 papers receiving 857 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 32
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 601
- Materials Chemistry 601
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering 294
- Condensed Matter Physics 184
- Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 106
Countries citing papers authored by Richard C. Hatch
This map shows the geographic impact of Richard C. Hatch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard C. Hatch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard C. Hatch more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Richard C. Hatch
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard C. Hatch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard C. Hatch. The network helps show where Richard C. Hatch may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Richard C. Hatch
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Richard C. Hatch. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Richard C. Hatch based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Richard C. Hatch. Richard C. Hatch is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 27 | |
| 2 | 29 | |
| 3 | 6 | |
| 4 | 32 | |
| 5 | 107 | |
| 6 | 43 | |
| 7 | 17 | |
| 8 | 16 | |
| 9 | 57 | |
| 10 | 37 | |
| 11 | 42 | |
| 12 | 6 | |
| 13 | 26 | |
| 14 | 121 | |
| 15 | 95 | |
| 16 | 64 | |
| 17 | 6 | |
| 18 | 3 | |
| 19 | 30 | |
| 20 | 25 |
About Richard C. Hatch
Richard C. Hatch is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Materials Chemistry and Condensed Matter Physics, having authored 22 papers that have together received 861 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Graphene research and applications (7 papers), Electronic and Structural Properties of Oxides (7 papers) and Topological Materials and Phenomena (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (601 citations), Condensed Matter Physics (184 citations) and Materials Chemistry (601 citations). Richard C. Hatch has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Denmark and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Marco Bianchi, Philip Hofmann, Jianli Mi, Bo B. Iversen, Hartmut Höchst, Dandan Guan, D. L. Hùber, Alexander A. Demkov, Agham Posadas and Miri Choi. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Review Letters, Advanced Materials and ACS Nano.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.