Richard C. Galbraith
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 10%
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Co-authors
- Benton J. UnderwoodMichael S. HumphreysThomas B. HolmanRobert F. StahmannJeffry H. LarsonRandal D. DaySusanne Frost OlsenJames E. Smith
- Topics
- Cognitive Abilities and Testing (5 papers)Memory Processes and Influences (4 papers)Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Richard C. Galbraith
18 papers receiving 303 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 151
- Cognitive Neuroscience 103
- Social Psychology 91
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 77
- Sociology and Political Science 75
Countries citing papers authored by Richard C. Galbraith
This map shows the geographic impact of Richard C. Galbraith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard C. Galbraith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard C. Galbraith more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Richard C. Galbraith
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard C. Galbraith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard C. Galbraith. The network helps show where Richard C. Galbraith may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Richard C. Galbraith
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Richard C. Galbraith. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Richard C. Galbraith based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Richard C. Galbraith. Richard C. Galbraith is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 12 | |
| 2 | 50 | |
| 3 | 8 | |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 16 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 121 | |
| 9 | Sibling Spacing and Academic Achievement: A Within-Family Perspective. | 2 |
| 10 | 3 | |
| 11 | 6 | |
| 12 | 5 | |
| 13 | 2 | |
| 14 | 3 | |
| 15 | 9 | |
| 16 | 42 | |
| 17 | 14 | |
| 18 | 66 |
About Richard C. Galbraith
Richard C. Galbraith is a scholar working on General Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Family Practice, having authored 18 papers that have together received 366 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cognitive Abilities and Testing (5 papers), Memory Processes and Influences (4 papers) and Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (151 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (77 citations) and Demography (67 citations). Richard C. Galbraith has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Benton J. Underwood, Michael S. Humphreys, Thomas B. Holman, Robert F. Stahmann, Jeffry H. Larson, Randal D. Day, Susanne Frost Olsen and James E. Smith. Their work appears in journals such as Child Development, Developmental Psychology and Memory & Cognition.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.