Richard C. Galbraith

22 total papers · 447 total citations
18 papers, 366 citations indexed

About

Richard C. Galbraith is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Richard C. Galbraith has authored 18 papers receiving a total of 366 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, 5 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology and 4 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Richard C. Galbraith's work include Cognitive Abilities and Testing (5 papers), Memory Processes and Influences (4 papers) and Child and Animal Learning Development (2 papers). Richard C. Galbraith is often cited by papers focused on Cognitive Abilities and Testing (5 papers), Memory Processes and Influences (4 papers) and Child and Animal Learning Development (2 papers). Richard C. Galbraith collaborates with scholars based in United States. Richard C. Galbraith's co-authors include Benton J. Underwood, Michael S. Humphreys, Thomas B. Holman, Robert F. Stahmann, Jeffry H. Larson, Randal D. Day, James E. Smith and Susanne Frost Olsen and has published in prestigious journals such as Child Development, Developmental Psychology and Memory & Cognition.

In The Last Decade

Richard C. Galbraith

18 papers receiving 303 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Richard C. Galbraith 151 103 91 77 75 18 366
Sharon Bertsch 130 0.9× 140 1.4× 92 1.0× 112 1.5× 63 0.8× 14 370
Diana S. Woodruff 95 0.6× 94 0.9× 88 1.0× 95 1.2× 58 0.8× 12 349
Ludmila Nunes 77 0.5× 130 1.3× 81 0.9× 95 1.2× 42 0.6× 19 361
François Rigalleau 97 0.6× 176 1.7× 56 0.6× 106 1.4× 68 0.9× 23 338
John Protzko 146 1.0× 115 1.1× 70 0.8× 62 0.8× 84 1.1× 36 400
Emily Schryer 54 0.4× 103 1.0× 102 1.1× 74 1.0× 98 1.3× 14 371
Janet E. Kilbride 122 0.8× 115 1.1× 135 1.5× 48 0.6× 83 1.1× 13 336
Jane L. Rankin 86 0.6× 188 1.8× 73 0.8× 93 1.2× 35 0.5× 15 368
Wei Xing Toh 92 0.6× 73 0.7× 48 0.5× 76 1.0× 110 1.5× 18 373
Diane M. Badzinski 64 0.4× 43 0.4× 116 1.3× 59 0.8× 111 1.5× 23 359

Countries citing papers authored by Richard C. Galbraith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Richard C. Galbraith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard C. Galbraith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard C. Galbraith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Richard C. Galbraith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard C. Galbraith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard C. Galbraith. The network helps show where Richard C. Galbraith may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Richard C. Galbraith

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Richard C. Galbraith. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Richard C. Galbraith based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Richard C. Galbraith. Richard C. Galbraith is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026