Richard A. Inman
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 10%
- Education top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Co-authors
- Paulo MoreiraC. Robert CloningerDiana CunhaKenneth W. GreenKevin M. CloningerRodrigo Ramírez‐CampilloPedro MorouçoFábio Yuzo Nakamura
- Topics
- Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (18 papers)Early Childhood Education and Development (10 papers)Personality Traits and Psychology (8 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaScientific ReportsPersonality and Individual Differences
- Partner nations
- PortugalUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Richard A. Inman
43 papers receiving 410 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
- Clinical Psychology 153
- Social Psychology 140
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 96
- Education 72
- Sociology and Political Science 51
Countries citing papers authored by Richard A. Inman
This map shows the geographic impact of Richard A. Inman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard A. Inman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard A. Inman more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Richard A. Inman
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard A. Inman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard A. Inman. The network helps show where Richard A. Inman may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Richard A. Inman
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Richard A. Inman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Richard A. Inman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Richard A. Inman. Richard A. Inman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 6 | |
| 5 | 20 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 25 | |
| 10 | 8 | |
| 11 | 7 | |
| 12 | 51 | |
| 13 | 20 | |
| 14 | 5 | |
| 15 | 3 | |
| 16 | 5 | |
| 17 | 2 | |
| 18 | 4 | |
| 19 | Coping with the Impending Labor Shortage | 0 |
| 20 | The Workplace Religious Freedom Act: ADA Problems under a New Name | 1 |
About Richard A. Inman
Richard A. Inman is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 48 papers that have together received 425 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (18 papers), Early Childhood Education and Development (10 papers) and Personality Traits and Psychology (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (48 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (96 citations) and Clinical Psychology (153 citations). Richard A. Inman has collaborated with scholars based in Portugal, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Paulo Moreira, C. Robert Cloninger, Diana Cunha, Kenneth W. Green, Kevin M. Cloninger, Rodrigo Ramírez‐Campillo, Pedro Morouço, Fábio Yuzo Nakamura, Filipe Manuel Clemente and Hugo Sarmento. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Scientific Reports and Personality and Individual Differences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.