Renae C. Mitchell
Impact in
- Social Psychology top 2%
- LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
- Gender Studies top 5%
- Gender Roles and Identity Studies
- Gender, Feminism, and Media
Papers in
-
- LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy 7
-
- Social and Intergroup Psychology 3
- Marriage and Sexual Relationships 1
- Co-authors
- M. Paz Galupo (11 shared papers)Kyle S. Davis (5 shared papers)Gregory S. Chasson (1 shared paper)Jean Ann Summers (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of Bisexuality (2 papers)International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology (1 paper)Psychology and Sexuality (1 paper)Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities (1 paper)Archives of Sexual Behavior (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Renae C. Mitchell
12 papers receiving 536 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
- Social Psychology 441
- Gender Studies 189
- Reproductive Medicine 93
- Clinical Psychology 217
- Sociology and Political Science 255
Countries citing papers authored by Renae C. Mitchell
This map shows the geographic impact of Renae C. Mitchell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Renae C. Mitchell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Renae C. Mitchell more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Renae C. Mitchell
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Renae C. Mitchell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Renae C. Mitchell. The network helps show where Renae C. Mitchell may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 4 scholars most cited alongside Renae C. Mitchell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2014 | 146 | |
| 2 | 2015 | 104 | |
| 3 | 2014 | 101 | |
| 4 | 2014 | 66 | |
| 5 | 2016 | 45 | |
| 6 | 2017 | 29 | |
| 7 | 2016 | 20 | |
| 8 | 2018 | 14 | |
| 9 | 2015 | 12 | |
| 10 | 2015 | 12 | |
| 11 | 2017 | 4 | |
| 12 | 2017 | 2 |
About Renae C. Mitchell
Renae C. Mitchell is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Clinical Psychology, Reproductive Medicine and Gender Studies, having authored 12 papers that have together received 555 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy (7 papers), Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (4 papers), Reproductive Health and Technologies (3 papers), Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (3 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (3 papers), Gender Roles and Identity Studies (2 papers), Marriage and Sexual Relationships (1 paper) and Child Welfare and Adoption (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Social Psychology (441 citations), Gender Studies (189 citations), Reproductive Medicine (93 citations), Clinical Psychology (217 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (255 citations). Renae C. Mitchell has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include M. Paz Galupo, Kyle S. Davis, Gregory S. Chasson and Jean Ann Summers. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Bisexuality, International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, Psychology and Sexuality, Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities and Archives of Sexual Behavior.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.