Réka Aszalós
- Global and Planetary Change top 5%
- Nature and Landscape Conservation top 5%
- Insect Science top 5%
- Ecology top 10%
- Plant Science
- Co-authors
- Péter ÓdorMiklós KertészBálint CzúczBence KovácsIldikó AranyFlóra TinyaMárton KissMarion Potschin-Young
- Topics
- Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (18 papers)Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (16 papers)Forest Management and Policy (11 papers)
- Partner nations
- HungaryUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Réka Aszalós
32 papers receiving 525 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
- Global and Planetary Change 313
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 230
- Insect Science 171
- Ecology 132
- Plant Science 124
Countries citing papers authored by Réka Aszalós
This map shows the geographic impact of Réka Aszalós's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Réka Aszalós with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Réka Aszalós more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Réka Aszalós
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Réka Aszalós. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Réka Aszalós. The network helps show where Réka Aszalós may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Réka Aszalós
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Réka Aszalós. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Réka Aszalós based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Réka Aszalós. Réka Aszalós is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 13 | |
| 5 | 19 | |
| 6 | 6 | |
| 7 | 8 | |
| 8 | 35 | |
| 9 | 34 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 20 | |
| 12 | Multi-functionality and sustainability in the European Union's forests | 25 |
| 13 | 19 | |
| 14 | 4 | |
| 15 | 138 | |
| 16 | 15 | |
| 17 | 6 | |
| 18 | Stand survey and forest history study of mature oak forest in the Vár-hegy Forest Reserve (Felsotárkány). | 1 |
| 19 | A természetvédelem hatása középhegységi erdeinkre | 1 |
| 20 | 23 |
About Réka Aszalós
Réka Aszalós is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Insect Science and Global and Planetary Change, having authored 33 papers that have together received 558 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (18 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (16 papers) and Forest Management and Policy (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (230 citations), Global and Planetary Change (313 citations) and Insect Science (171 citations). Réka Aszalós has collaborated with scholars based in Hungary, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Péter Ódor, Miklós Kertész, Bálint Czúcz, Bence Kovács, Ildikó Arany, Flóra Tinya, Márton Kiss, Marion Potschin-Young, Tibor Standovár and Roy Haines‐Young. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Scientific Reports and Forest Ecology and Management.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.