G.J. Nabuurs
- Global and Planetary Change top 0.1%
- Nature and Landscape Conservation top 0.2%
- Ecology top 1%
- Environmental Engineering top 0.5%
- Insect Science top 0.5%
- Co-authors
- Mart‐Jan SchelhaasAndreas SchuckG.M.J. MohrenMarc HanewinkelNiklaus E. ZimmermannA. PussinenGeerten HengeveldChristopher B. Field
- Topics
- Forest Management and Policy (107 papers)Forest ecology and management (68 papers)Forest Biomass Utilization and Management (31 papers)
- Journals
- NatureScienceNature Communications
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsFinlandGermany
In The Last Decade
G.J. Nabuurs
169 papers receiving 8.5k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 141
- Global and Planetary Change 6.1k
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 3.9k
- Ecology 1.9k
- Environmental Engineering 1.5k
- Insect Science 1.3k
Countries citing papers authored by G.J. Nabuurs
This map shows the geographic impact of G.J. Nabuurs's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G.J. Nabuurs with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G.J. Nabuurs more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by G.J. Nabuurs
This network shows the impact of papers produced by G.J. Nabuurs. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G.J. Nabuurs. The network helps show where G.J. Nabuurs may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of G.J. Nabuurs
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of G.J. Nabuurs. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of G.J. Nabuurs based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with G.J. Nabuurs. G.J. Nabuurs is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 12 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 14 | |
| 5 | 16 | |
| 6 | Changes in global terrestrial live biomass over the 21st centurybreakdown → | 200 |
| 7 | 23 | |
| 8 | 29 | |
| 9 | 33 | |
| 10 | 39 | |
| 11 | 29 | |
| 12 | 24 | |
| 13 | 18 | |
| 14 | 124 | |
| 15 | 29 | |
| 16 | Sectoral emission reduction potentials: comparing bottom-up and top-down approaches | 1 |
| 17 | Top-down and bottom-up carbon budgets of North America, Europe and Asia | 1 |
| 18 | Specific study on forest greenhouse gas budget | 15 |
| 19 | Nature-Oriented Forest Management in Europe | 8 |
| 20 | How much forest do you have under the Kyoto Protocol | 0 |
About G.J. Nabuurs
G.J. Nabuurs is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Global and Planetary Change and Agronomy and Crop Science, having authored 176 papers that have together received 9.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Forest Management and Policy (107 papers), Forest ecology and management (68 papers) and Forest Biomass Utilization and Management (31 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (3.9k citations), Global and Planetary Change (6.1k citations) and Insect Science (1.3k citations). G.J. Nabuurs has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Finland and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Mart‐Jan Schelhaas, Andreas Schuck, G.M.J. Mohren, Marc Hanewinkel, Niklaus E. Zimmermann, A. Pussinen, Geerten Hengeveld, Christopher B. Field, Timo Karjalainen and Jari Liski. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, Science and Nature Communications.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.