Rebecca Lemov
- History and Philosophy of Science top 2%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Political Science and International Relations
- General Psychology top 10%
- Clinical Psychology
- Topics
- Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life (2 papers)Data Analysis and Archiving (2 papers)Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- GermanyUnited States
In The Last Decade
Rebecca Lemov
13 papers receiving 149 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
- History and Philosophy of Science 63
- Sociology and Political Science 60
- Political Science and International Relations 35
- General Psychology 23
- Clinical Psychology 18
Countries citing papers authored by Rebecca Lemov
This map shows the geographic impact of Rebecca Lemov's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rebecca Lemov with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rebecca Lemov more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Rebecca Lemov
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rebecca Lemov. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rebecca Lemov. The network helps show where Rebecca Lemov may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Rebecca Lemov
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Rebecca Lemov. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Rebecca Lemov based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Rebecca Lemov. Rebecca Lemov is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 8 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 6 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | On not being there : the data-driven body at work and at play | 2 |
| 8 | Database of Dreams: The Lost Quest to Catalog Humanity | 28 |
| 9 | How Reason Almost Lost Its Mind: The Strange Career of Cold War Rationality | 91 |
| 10 | Running Amok in Labyrinthine Systems: The Cyber-Behaviorist Origins of Soft Torture | 2 |
| 11 | 15 | |
| 12 | 18 | |
| 13 | Filing the total human : anthropological archives from 1928 to 1963 | 3 |
| 14 | 10 | |
| 15 | 13 | |
| 16 | The laboratory imagination : experiments in human and social engineering, 1929-1956 | 1 |
About Rebecca Lemov
Rebecca Lemov is a scholar working on General Psychology, History and Philosophy of Science and Music, having authored 16 papers that have together received 202 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life (2 papers), Data Analysis and Archiving (2 papers) and Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Psychology (23 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (63 citations) and History (18 citations). Rebecca Lemov has collaborated with scholars based in Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Lorraine Daston, Paul Erickson, Thomas Sturm, Judy L. Klein and Michael D. Gordin. Their work appears in journals such as Technology and Culture, Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences and Isis.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.