Rebecca K. Helm

695 total citations
40 papers, 322 citations indexed

About

Rebecca K. Helm is a scholar working on Law, Social Psychology and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Rebecca K. Helm has authored 40 papers receiving a total of 322 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 19 papers in Law, 17 papers in Social Psychology and 13 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Rebecca K. Helm's work include Deception detection and forensic psychology (16 papers), Jury Decision Making Processes (12 papers) and Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (10 papers). Rebecca K. Helm is often cited by papers focused on Deception detection and forensic psychology (16 papers), Jury Decision Making Processes (12 papers) and Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (10 papers). Rebecca K. Helm collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and New Zealand. Rebecca K. Helm's co-authors include Joshua M. Smyth, Valerie F. Reyna, John H. Blume, Hitoshi Nasu, Stephen J. Ceci, Valerie P. Hans, Bethany Growns, Daniel Newman, Anthony Turpin and Jeffrey J. Rachlinski and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Journal of Experimental Psychology General and Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.

In The Last Decade

Rebecca K. Helm

31 papers receiving 292 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Rebecca K. Helm United Kingdom 10 131 125 86 77 56 40 322
Lora M. Levett United States 10 100 0.8× 133 1.1× 49 0.6× 110 1.4× 17 0.3× 16 321
Margit Oswald Switzerland 7 80 0.6× 129 1.0× 76 0.9× 21 0.3× 15 0.3× 27 272
Dorothy K. Kagehiro United States 8 91 0.7× 109 0.9× 44 0.5× 139 1.8× 72 1.3× 18 338
Hedy R. Dexter United States 7 269 2.1× 106 0.8× 46 0.5× 303 3.9× 27 0.5× 8 545
Stephen P. Garvey United States 13 89 0.7× 261 2.1× 132 1.5× 173 2.2× 61 1.1× 48 464
Tom Dougherty United States 13 43 0.3× 154 1.2× 21 0.2× 19 0.2× 15 0.3× 32 418
Lara A. Frumkin United Kingdom 8 64 0.5× 84 0.7× 18 0.2× 26 0.3× 11 0.2× 30 233
Kirk Luther Canada 10 199 1.5× 98 0.8× 101 1.2× 11 0.1× 7 0.1× 33 353
Anna–Carin Jonsson Sweden 10 217 1.7× 89 0.7× 90 1.0× 7 0.1× 7 0.1× 18 407
Jack P. Lipton United States 10 139 1.1× 75 0.6× 33 0.4× 36 0.5× 10 0.2× 21 382

Countries citing papers authored by Rebecca K. Helm

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Rebecca K. Helm's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rebecca K. Helm with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rebecca K. Helm more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Rebecca K. Helm

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rebecca K. Helm. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rebecca K. Helm. The network helps show where Rebecca K. Helm may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Rebecca K. Helm

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Rebecca K. Helm. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Rebecca K. Helm based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Rebecca K. Helm. Rebecca K. Helm is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Reyna, Valerie F., et al.. (2025). Framing Biases in Plea Bargaining Decisions in Those With and Without Criminal Involvement: Tests of Theoretical Assumptions. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making. 38(2). 3 indexed citations
2.
Ries, Julie D., et al.. (2025). Defying Gravity: A Pilot Study of the Effects of Rock Climbing on Physical and Psychosocial Function of Individuals With Parkinson Disease. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 106(4). e174–e175.
4.
Redlich, Allison D., Michael P. Donnelly, Manuel Gallén, et al.. (2025). Urgent issues and prospects in guilty plea research and practice. Legal and Criminological Psychology. 30(2). 193–211.
5.
Helm, Rebecca K.. (2024). The Psychology of Guilty Plea Decisions. Annual Review of Law and Social Science. 20(1). 183–199. 1 indexed citations
6.
Helm, Rebecca K.. (2023). Wrongful Conviction in England and Wales: An Assessment of Successful Appeals and Key Contributors. Érudit (Université de Montréal). 3(3). 196–217. 6 indexed citations
7.
Zottoli, Tina M., Rebecca K. Helm, Vanessa A. Edkins, & Michael T. Bixter. (2023). Developing a model of guilty plea decision-making: Fuzzy-trace theory, gist, and categorical boundaries.. Law and Human Behavior. 47(3). 403–421. 5 indexed citations
8.
Growns, Bethany, Jeff Kukucka, Richard Moorhead, & Rebecca K. Helm. (2023). The Post Office Scandal in the United Kingdom: Mental health and social experiences of wrongly convicted and wrongly accused individuals. Legal and Criminological Psychology. 29(1). 17–31. 3 indexed citations
9.
Wilson‐Kovacs, Dana, et al.. (2023). Digital evidence in defence practice: Prevalence, challenges and expertise. The International Journal of Evidence & Proof. 27(3). 235–253. 5 indexed citations
10.
Moorhead, Richard, et al.. (2023). Independent Review, Miscarriages of Justice, and Computer Evidence. 96–119.
11.
Growns, Bethany, James D. Dunn, Rebecca K. Helm, Alice Towler, & Jeff Kukucka. (2022). The low prevalence effect in fingerprint comparison amongst forensic science trainees and novices. PLoS ONE. 17(8). e0272338–e0272338. 3 indexed citations
12.
Hans, Valerie P., et al.. (2022). Guiding jurors’ damage award decisions: Experimental investigations of approaches based on theory and practice.. Psychology Public Policy and Law. 28(2). 188–212. 1 indexed citations
13.
Helm, Rebecca K. & Hitoshi Nasu. (2020). Regulatory Responses to ‘Fake News’ and Freedom of Expression: Normative and Empirical Evaluation. Human Rights Law Review. 21(2). 302–328. 24 indexed citations
14.
Helm, Rebecca K.. (2019). Constrained Waiver of Trial Rights? Incentives to Plead Guilty and the Right to a Fair Trial. Journal of Law and Society. 46(3). 423–447. 12 indexed citations
15.
Helm, Rebecca K., et al.. (2018). Limitations on the ability to negotiate justice: attorney perspectives on guilt, innocence, and legal advice in the current plea system. Psychology Crime and Law. 24(9). 915–934. 17 indexed citations
16.
Hans, Valerie P., Rebecca K. Helm, & Valerie F. Reyna. (2018). From meaning to money: Translating injury into dollars.. Law and Human Behavior. 42(2). 95–109. 6 indexed citations
17.
Helm, Rebecca K., Valerie P. Hans, & Valerie F. Reyna. (2017). Trial by Numbers. Cornell journal of law and public policy. 27(1). 107–143. 4 indexed citations
18.
Helm, Rebecca K. & Valerie F. Reyna. (2017). Logical but incompetent plea decisions: A new approach to plea bargaining grounded in cognitive theory.. Psychology Public Policy and Law. 23(3). 367–380. 19 indexed citations
19.
Blume, John H. & Rebecca K. Helm. (2014). The Unexonerated: Factually Innocent Defendants Who Plead Guilty. Cornell law review/˜The œCornell law quarterly. 100(1). 157. 18 indexed citations
20.
Smyth, Joshua M. & Rebecca K. Helm. (2003). Focused expressive writing as self‐help for stress and trauma. Journal of Clinical Psychology. 59(2). 227–235. 64 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026