Rebecca K. Helm
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Clinical Psychology
- Law top 2%
- Economics and Econometrics
- Co-authors
- Joshua M. SmythValerie F. ReynaJohn H. BlumeHitoshi NasuStephen J. CeciValerie P. HansBethany GrownsDaniel Newman
- Topics
- Deception detection and forensic psychology (16 papers)Jury Decision Making Processes (12 papers)Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (10 papers)
- Journals
- PLoS ONEJournal of Experimental Psychology GeneralArchives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesNew Zealand
In The Last Decade
Rebecca K. Helm
31 papers receiving 292 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
- Social Psychology 131
- Sociology and Political Science 125
- Clinical Psychology 86
- Law 77
- Economics and Econometrics 56
Countries citing papers authored by Rebecca K. Helm
This map shows the geographic impact of Rebecca K. Helm's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rebecca K. Helm with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rebecca K. Helm more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Rebecca K. Helm
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rebecca K. Helm. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rebecca K. Helm. The network helps show where Rebecca K. Helm may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Rebecca K. Helm
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Rebecca K. Helm. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Rebecca K. Helm based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Rebecca K. Helm. Rebecca K. Helm is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 5 | |
| 7 | 6 | |
| 8 | 0 | |
| 9 | 3 | |
| 10 | 5 | |
| 11 | 3 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 24 | |
| 14 | 12 | |
| 15 | 6 | |
| 16 | 17 | |
| 17 | 12 | |
| 18 | Trial by Numbers | 4 |
| 19 | The Unexonerated: Factually Innocent Defendants Who Plead Guilty | 18 |
| 20 | 64 |
About Rebecca K. Helm
Rebecca K. Helm is a scholar working on General Decision Sciences, Law and Social Psychology, having authored 40 papers that have together received 322 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Deception detection and forensic psychology (16 papers), Jury Decision Making Processes (12 papers) and Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (25 citations), Law (77 citations) and Social Psychology (131 citations). Rebecca K. Helm has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Joshua M. Smyth, Valerie F. Reyna, John H. Blume, Hitoshi Nasu, Stephen J. Ceci, Valerie P. Hans, Bethany Growns, Daniel Newman, Rebecca B. Weldon and Andrew J. Wistrich. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Journal of Experimental Psychology General and Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.