John H. Blume

439 total citations
50 papers, 209 citations indexed

About

John H. Blume is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science and Law. According to data from OpenAlex, John H. Blume has authored 50 papers receiving a total of 209 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 22 papers in Political Science and International Relations, 16 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 15 papers in Law. Recurrent topics in John H. Blume's work include Legal Systems and Judicial Processes (20 papers), Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (14 papers) and Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems (10 papers). John H. Blume is often cited by papers focused on Legal Systems and Judicial Processes (20 papers), Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (14 papers) and Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems (10 papers). John H. Blume collaborates with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. John H. Blume's co-authors include Sheri L. Johnson, Theodore Eisenberg, Rebecca K. Helm, Martin T. Wells, Stephen P. Garvey, Valerie P. Hans, Paul Marcus, Marc J. Tassé, Alan Williams and Mi Yang and has published in prestigious journals such as Cancer Research, PLoS Computational Biology and The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (1973-).

In The Last Decade

John H. Blume

39 papers receiving 183 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
John H. Blume United States 7 118 80 56 48 25 50 209
Marvin Zalman United States 9 174 1.5× 63 0.8× 72 1.3× 23 0.5× 80 3.2× 41 228
Carol S. Steiker United States 9 155 1.3× 62 0.8× 39 0.7× 28 0.6× 6 0.2× 40 210
Yale Kamisar United States 8 82 0.7× 66 0.8× 70 1.3× 22 0.5× 44 1.8× 83 269
Jefferson E. Holcomb United States 7 256 2.2× 53 0.7× 93 1.7× 29 0.6× 16 0.6× 14 306
Kevin Kwok‐yin Cheng Hong Kong 9 196 1.7× 64 0.8× 79 1.4× 17 0.4× 21 0.8× 36 266
Peter Duff United Kingdom 8 233 2.0× 152 1.9× 98 1.8× 31 0.6× 20 0.8× 38 376
Wayne A. Logan United States 9 226 1.9× 40 0.5× 151 2.7× 21 0.4× 19 0.8× 50 281
Laura Sweeney United States 3 108 0.9× 64 0.8× 34 0.6× 12 0.3× 38 1.5× 3 168
Kevin R. Reitz United States 10 339 2.9× 62 0.8× 166 3.0× 39 0.8× 9 0.4× 42 390
Lynne Henderson United States 6 109 0.9× 83 1.0× 26 0.5× 9 0.2× 25 1.0× 20 203

Countries citing papers authored by John H. Blume

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John H. Blume's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John H. Blume with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John H. Blume more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John H. Blume

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John H. Blume. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John H. Blume. The network helps show where John H. Blume may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of John H. Blume

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John H. Blume. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John H. Blume based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John H. Blume. John H. Blume is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Johnson, Sheri L., et al.. (2018). Protecting People with Intellectual Disability from Wrongful Execution: Guidelines for Competent Representation. Hofstra law review. 46(4). 4. 1 indexed citations
2.
Johnson, Sheri L., et al.. (2018). Convictions of Innocent People with Intellectual Disability. Albany law review. 82(3). 1031. 1 indexed citations
3.
Johnson, Sheri L., et al.. (2016). When Empathy Bites Back: Cautionary Tales from Neuroscience for Capital Sentencing. Fordham law review. 85(2). 573. 4 indexed citations
4.
Blume, John H., et al.. (2014). A Tale of Two (and Possibly Three) Atkins: Intellectual Disability and Capital Punishment Twelve Years After the Supreme Court’s Creation of a Categorical Bar. SSRN Electronic Journal. 23(2). 393. 3 indexed citations
5.
Blume, John H. & Rebecca K. Helm. (2014). The Unexonerated: Factually Innocent Defendants Who Plead Guilty. Cornell law review/˜The œCornell law quarterly. 100(1). 157. 18 indexed citations
6.
Blume, John H., et al.. (2012). Convicting Lennie: Mental Retardation, Wrongful Convictions, and the Right to a Fair Trial. eYLS (Yale Law School). 56(3). 944–967. 3 indexed citations
7.
Johnson, Sheri L., John H. Blume, & Patrick M. Wilson. (2011). Racial Epithets in the Criminal Process. SSRN Electronic Journal.
8.
Blume, John H., et al.. (2011). Unwell: Indiana v. Edwards and the Fate of Mentally Ill Pro Se Defendants. Cornell journal of law and public policy. 21(1). 151. 1 indexed citations
9.
Blume, John H., et al.. (2011). Life, Death, and Neuroimaging: The Advantages and Disadvantages of The Defense’s Use of Neuroimages in Capital Cases - Lessons from the Front. eYLS (Yale Law School). 62(3). 7. 1 indexed citations
10.
Blume, John H., et al.. (2009). An Empirical Look at Atkins v. Virginia and its Application in Capital Cases. SSRN Electronic Journal. 7 indexed citations
11.
Blume, John H., et al.. (2008). Competent Capital Representation: The Necessity of Knowing and Heeding What Jurors Tell Us About Mitigation. Hofstra law review. 36(3). 15. 5 indexed citations
12.
Blume, John H., Theodore Eisenberg, Sheri L. Johnson, & Valerie P. Hans. (2008). The Death Penalty in Delaware: An Empirical Study. Iowa law review. 97. 1 indexed citations
13.
Blume, John H., et al.. (2007). "It's Like Deja Vu All Over Again": Williams v. Taylor, Wiggins v. Smith, Rompilla v. Beard and a (Partial) Return to the Guidelines Approach to the Effective Assistance of Counsel. SSRN Electronic Journal. 1 indexed citations
14.
Blume, John H.. (2006). AEDPA: The " Hype" and the "Bite". Cornell law review/˜The œCornell law quarterly. 91(2). 259. 1 indexed citations
15.
Blume, John H., et al.. (2005). Reliability Matters: Reassociating Bagley Materiality, Strickland Prejudice, and Cumulative Harmless Error. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (1973-). 95(4). 1153–1194.
16.
Blume, John H.. (2004). Killing the Willing: "Volunteers," Suicide and Competency. Michigan Law Review. 103(5). 939–1009. 6 indexed citations
17.
Blume, John H. & Sheri L. Johnson. (2003). Killing the Non-Willing: Atkins, the Volitionally Incapacitated, and the Death Penalty. Scholar Commons (University of South Carolina). 55(1). 5. 1 indexed citations
18.
Blume, John H.. (2003). Ten Years of Payne: Victim Impact Evidence in Capital Cases. Cornell law review/˜The œCornell law quarterly. 88(2). 257. 14 indexed citations
19.
Blume, John H., et al.. (2001). Probing "Life Qualification" through Expanded Voir Dire. Hofstra law review. 29(4). 9. 6 indexed citations
20.
Blume, John H., Stephen P. Garvey, & Sheri L. Johnson. (2001). Future Dangerousness in Capital Cases: Always "At Issue". Cornell law review/˜The œCornell law quarterly. 86(2). 397. 27 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026