Rebecca Baines
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Sam Regan de BerePatricia MoránAmanda BunnAntonia BifulcoArunangsu ChatterjeeSebastian StevensJulian ArcherC. Ball
- Topics
- Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (7 papers)Healthcare Systems and Technology (6 papers)Ethics in Clinical Research (4 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaJournal of Child Psychology and PsychiatryJournal of Medical Internet Research
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Rebecca Baines
34 papers receiving 782 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 107
- General Health Professions 358
- Clinical Psychology 305
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 231
- Sociology and Political Science 101
- Social Psychology 92
Countries citing papers authored by Rebecca Baines
This map shows the geographic impact of Rebecca Baines's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rebecca Baines with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rebecca Baines more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Rebecca Baines
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rebecca Baines. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rebecca Baines. The network helps show where Rebecca Baines may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Rebecca Baines
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Rebecca Baines. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Rebecca Baines based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Rebecca Baines. Rebecca Baines is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | 31 | |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | 13 | |
| 8 | 9 | |
| 9 | 10 | |
| 10 | 13 | |
| 11 | 9 | |
| 12 | 18 | |
| 13 | 29 | |
| 14 | 21 | |
| 15 | 10 | |
| 16 | 2 | |
| 17 | 4 | |
| 18 | 4 | |
| 19 | 56 | |
| 20 | 147 |
About Rebecca Baines
Rebecca Baines is a scholar working on Family Practice, General Dentistry and General Health Professions, having authored 35 papers that have together received 823 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (7 papers), Healthcare Systems and Technology (6 papers) and Ethics in Clinical Research (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (305 citations), General Health Professions (358 citations) and Family Practice (23 citations). Rebecca Baines has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Sam Regan de Bere, Patricia Morán, Amanda Bunn, Antonia Bifulco, Arunangsu Chatterjee, Sebastian Stevens, Julian Archer, C. Ball, C. Jacobs and Ray Jones. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Journal of Medical Internet Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.