Raymond Boon Tar Lim
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Epidemiology
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 10%
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Co-authors
- Mee Lian WongDede Kam Tyng ThamKee Seng ChiaHuili ZhengFalk Müller‐RiemenschneiderWei Yen LimKok Hian TanHiromi W.L. Koh
- Topics
- Sex work and related issues (11 papers)Diabetes Management and Education (7 papers)HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions (7 papers)
In The Last Decade
Raymond Boon Tar Lim
42 papers receiving 835 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 136
- General Health Professions 229
- Epidemiology 154
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 146
- Clinical Psychology 133
- Sociology and Political Science 124
Countries citing papers authored by Raymond Boon Tar Lim
This map shows the geographic impact of Raymond Boon Tar Lim's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Raymond Boon Tar Lim with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Raymond Boon Tar Lim more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Raymond Boon Tar Lim
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Raymond Boon Tar Lim. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Raymond Boon Tar Lim. The network helps show where Raymond Boon Tar Lim may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Raymond Boon Tar Lim
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Raymond Boon Tar Lim. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Raymond Boon Tar Lim based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Raymond Boon Tar Lim. Raymond Boon Tar Lim is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 5 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 4 | |
| 8 | 14 | |
| 9 | 7 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 6 | |
| 12 | 7 | |
| 13 | 8 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 14 | |
| 16 | 30 | |
| 17 | 27 | |
| 18 | 5 | |
| 19 | 32 | |
| 20 | HPB Online: an electronic health education portal in Singapore. | 3 |
About Raymond Boon Tar Lim
Raymond Boon Tar Lim is a scholar working on Family Practice, Pharmacy and General Health Professions, having authored 45 papers that have together received 847 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sex work and related issues (11 papers), Diabetes Management and Education (7 papers) and HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (95 citations), General Health Professions (229 citations) and Applied Psychology (35 citations). Raymond Boon Tar Lim has collaborated with scholars based in Singapore, Brunei and Cambodia. Frequent co-authors include Mee Lian Wong, Dede Kam Tyng Tham, Kee Seng Chia, Huili Zheng, Falk Müller‐Riemenschneider, Wei Yen Lim, Kok Hian Tan, Hiromi W.L. Koh, Alex R. Cook and Roy Chan. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Cancer, Journal of Investigative Dermatology and Nutrients.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.