Rachel Clark

35 papers receiving 934 citations

Hit Papers

What are the best methodologies for rapid reviews of the ...2016202620192022201650100150200250

Peers

Rachel Clark
Comparison fields: 5 of 147
  • General Health Professions 351
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 194
  • Clinical Psychology 98
  • Epidemiology 93
  • Sociology and Political Science 91
Replace Smita Shah with:
Smita Shah Australia
Myoungock Jang United States
Patricia Huston Canada
Evelina Chapman United States
Lindsay R. Pool United States
Christoph Junker Switzerland
Jennifer O’Neill Canada
Philip Baker Australia
Kei Long Cheung Netherlands
Álvaro Taype-Rondán Peru
Rachel Clark relative to Smita Shah Australia Smita Shah's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Smita Shah · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Rachel Clark

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Rachel Clark's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rachel Clark with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rachel Clark more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Rachel Clark

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rachel Clark. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rachel Clark. The network helps show where Rachel Clark may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Rachel Clark

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Rachel Clark. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Rachel Clark based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Rachel Clark. Rachel Clark is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 1
2
Screening for Vitamin D Deficiency in Adults: An Evidence Review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force
2
3 51
4 4
5 3
6 53
7 22
8 1
9
What are the best methodologies for rapid reviews of the research evidence for evidence-informed decision making in health policy and practice: a rapid reviewbreakdown →
277
10
Energy interventions that facilitate sustainable development and impact health: an overview of systematic reviews.
3
11 32
12 28
13 121
14 34
15 22
16 41
17 3
18 2
19 3
20
Radiographic magnification: a critical, theoretical and practical analysis
7

About Rachel Clark

Rachel Clark is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Urology and Microbiology, having authored 36 papers that have together received 963 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Health Policy Implementation Science (5 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (4 papers) and Health Sciences Research and Education (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Health Professions (351 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (51 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (194 citations). Rachel Clark has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Mexico. Frequent co-authors include Michelle M. Haby, Evelina Chapman, Ludovic Revéiz, John N. Lavis, Jorge Otávio Maia Barreto, Laurence Moore, Leila C. Kahwati, Meera Viswanathan, Rachel Palmieri Weber and Boyd Swinburn. Their work appears in journals such as JAMA, PLoS ONE and Radiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026