Günter Köhnken
- Social Psychology top 1%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Artificial Intelligence top 10%
- Co-authors
- Ray BullAmina MemonLucy AkehurstAldert VrijRebecca MilneMax StellerAntonio L. ManzaneroAnne Maass
- Topics
- Deception detection and forensic psychology (17 papers)Memory Processes and Influences (10 papers)Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- GermanyUnited KingdomChile
In The Last Decade
Günter Köhnken
26 papers receiving 960 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
- Social Psychology 816
- Cognitive Neuroscience 526
- Clinical Psychology 376
- Sociology and Political Science 276
- Artificial Intelligence 142
Countries citing papers authored by Günter Köhnken
This map shows the geographic impact of Günter Köhnken's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Günter Köhnken with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Günter Köhnken more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Günter Köhnken
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Günter Köhnken. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Günter Köhnken. The network helps show where Günter Köhnken may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Günter Köhnken
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Günter Köhnken. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Günter Köhnken based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Günter Köhnken. Günter Köhnken is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 30 | |
| 2 | Statement validity assessment: myths and limitations | 3 |
| 3 | 13 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 35 | |
| 6 | 36 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 235 | |
| 9 | 4 | |
| 10 | 195 | |
| 11 | 73 | |
| 12 | 10 | |
| 13 | 2 | |
| 14 | 3 | |
| 15 | 64 | |
| 16 | Glaubwürdigkeit: Untersuchungen zu einem psychologischen Konstrukt | 15 |
| 17 | 21 | |
| 18 | 10 | |
| 19 | Training police officers to detect deceptive eyewitness statements: Does it work? | 70 |
| 20 | Zur Glaubwürdigkeit von Zeugenaussagen: Experimentelle Überprüfung ausgewählter Glaubwürdigkeitskriterien. | 1 |
About Günter Köhnken
Günter Köhnken is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, having authored 27 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Deception detection and forensic psychology (17 papers), Memory Processes and Influences (10 papers) and Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Social Psychology (816 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (526 citations) and Clinical Psychology (376 citations). Günter Köhnken has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United Kingdom and Chile. Frequent co-authors include Ray Bull, Amina Memon, Lucy Akehurst, Aldert Vrij, Rebecca Milne, Max Steller, Ray Bull, Antonio L. Manzanero, Anne Maass and José Manuel Muñoz. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Applied Psychology, Applied Cognitive Psychology and Neurological Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.