Ralph E. Charlton

1.6k citations
44 papers · 1.3k · h-index 25

Impact in

Papers in

Ralph E. Charlton

43 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Ralph E. Charlton
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
  • Insect Science 819
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 548
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 244
  • Genetics 447
  • Ecological Modeling 55
Replace Toshitaka Hidaka with:
Toshitaka Hidaka Japan
Guy Vannier France
C. Ruth Archer United Kingdom
Magali Proffit France
Martin J. Steinbauer Australia
Fang‐Sen Xue China
Marc Rhainds Canada
Diane Wagner United States
Mogens Gissel Nielsen Denmark
Toomas Esperk Estonia
Ralph E. Charlton relative to Toshitaka Hidaka Japan Toshitaka Hidaka's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.4×
Toshitaka Hidaka · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ralph E. Charlton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ralph E. Charlton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ralph E. Charlton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ralph E. Charlton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ralph E. Charlton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ralph E. Charlton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ralph E. Charlton. The network helps show where Ralph E. Charlton may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ralph E. Charlton, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ralph E. Charlton Line = papers co-authored together Ralph E. Charlton links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 44 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1989108
2 200575
3 199368
4 198263
5 199056
6 198753
7 200649
8 200248
9 200047
10 198144
11 199641
12 198739
13 199036
14 200035
15 200135
16 200235
17 199834
18 199933
19 199332
20 200230

About Ralph E. Charlton

Ralph E. Charlton is a scholar working on Insect Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Genetics, Ecology and Nature and Landscape Conservation, having authored 44 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant and animal studies (22 papers), Insect Pheromone Research and Control (20 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (16 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (12 papers), Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (8 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (4 papers), Freshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology (4 papers) and Insect Pest Control Strategies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (819 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (548 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (244 citations), Genetics (447 citations) and Ecological Modeling (55 citations). Ralph E. Charlton has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Ring T. Cardé, Matt R. Whiles, Ring T. Card�, Wendell L. Roelofs, David C. Margolies, Clinton K. Meyer, Coby Schal, Juliet D. Tang, Brian J. Kopper and Kun Yan Zhu. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Chemical Ecology, Annals of the Entomological Society of America, Journal of Insect Behavior, Environmental Entomology and Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact