Juliet D. Tang
- Molecular Biology top 10%
- Plant Science top 5%
- Insect Science top 1%
- Genetics top 10%
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 10%
- Co-authors
- Anthony M. SheltonR. T. RoushElizabeth D. EarleMarilyn L. WarburtonWendell L. RoelofsW. Paul WilliamsAndy PerkinsRalph E. Charlton
- Topics
- Insect and Pesticide Research (12 papers)Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (10 papers)Insect Resistance and Genetics (10 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustraliaCanada
In The Last Decade
Juliet D. Tang
41 papers receiving 1.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
- Molecular Biology 746
- Plant Science 725
- Insect Science 681
- Genetics 205
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 156
Countries citing papers authored by Juliet D. Tang
This map shows the geographic impact of Juliet D. Tang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Juliet D. Tang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Juliet D. Tang more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Juliet D. Tang
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Juliet D. Tang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Juliet D. Tang. The network helps show where Juliet D. Tang may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Juliet D. Tang
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Juliet D. Tang. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Juliet D. Tang based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Juliet D. Tang. Juliet D. Tang is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 17 | |
| 2 | 41 | |
| 3 | Utility of image software in quantification of termite damage on cross-laminated timber (CLT) | 2 |
| 4 | Ongoing termite studies on cross laminated timber (CLT) panels | 2 |
| 5 | 6 | |
| 6 | 5 | |
| 7 | 7 | |
| 8 | 20 | |
| 9 | 46 | |
| 10 | Potential impact of subterranean termites on cross-laminated timber (CLT) in the Southeastern U.S | 2 |
| 11 | Defeating copper tolerance: an example of how “omics” research can accelerate discovery of new wood protection compounds | 2 |
| 12 | Activity of two strobilurin fungicides against three species of decay fungi in agar plate tests | 2 |
| 13 | 44 | |
| 14 | 35 | |
| 15 | 28 | |
| 16 | 174 | |
| 17 | 124 | |
| 18 | 20 | |
| 19 | 77 | |
| 20 | 26 |
About Juliet D. Tang
Juliet D. Tang is a scholar working on Insect Science, Plant Science and Genetics, having authored 42 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Insect and Pesticide Research (12 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (10 papers) and Insect Resistance and Genetics (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (681 citations), Plant Science (725 citations) and Molecular Biology (746 citations). Juliet D. Tang has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Anthony M. Shelton, R. T. Roush, Elizabeth D. Earle, Marilyn L. Warburton, Wendell L. Roelofs, W. Paul Williams, Andy Perkins, Ralph E. Charlton, Walter A. Wolf and Hilda L. Collins. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Nature Biotechnology and PLoS ONE.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.