C. Ruth Archer

2.0k total citations
43 papers, 945 citations indexed

About

C. Ruth Archer is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Insect Science and Genetics. According to data from OpenAlex, C. Ruth Archer has authored 43 papers receiving a total of 945 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 29 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, 24 papers in Insect Science and 20 papers in Genetics. Recurrent topics in C. Ruth Archer's work include Plant and animal studies (19 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (18 papers) and Animal Behavior and Reproduction (17 papers). C. Ruth Archer is often cited by papers focused on Plant and animal studies (19 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (18 papers) and Animal Behavior and Reproduction (17 papers). C. Ruth Archer collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Germany and Australia. C. Ruth Archer's co-authors include John Hunt, Sue W. Nicolson, Christian W. W. Pirk, James Rapkin, Kim Jensen, Luísa G. Carvalheiro, David J. Hosken, Clarissa M. House, Scott K. Sakaluk and Nick J. Royle and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature Communications, Current Biology and Scientific Reports.

In The Last Decade

C. Ruth Archer

42 papers receiving 928 citations

Peers

C. Ruth Archer

EEBS

GENET

ECOLO

Emily L. Behrman United States

Alexandra G. Imasheva Russia

Toomas Esperk Estonia

Paul K. Abram Canada

William G. Wallin United States

Leigh Boardman South Africa

Caitlin Dmitriew Canada

Oliver Mitesser Germany

Clarissa M. House United Kingdom

Kensuke Okada Japan

Emily L. Behrman United States

C. Ruth Archer

324 ×0.6

EEBS

211 ×0.5

490 ×1.5

GENET

283 ×1.5

ECOLO

68 ×0.4

Citations per year, relative to C. Ruth Archer C. Ruth Archer (= 1×) peers Emily L. Behrman

Countries citing papers authored by C. Ruth Archer

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C. Ruth Archer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. Ruth Archer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. Ruth Archer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C. Ruth Archer

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. Ruth Archer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. Ruth Archer. The network helps show where C. Ruth Archer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of C. Ruth Archer

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of C. Ruth Archer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of C. Ruth Archer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with C. Ruth Archer. C. Ruth Archer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Archer, C. Ruth, et al.. (2025). Is antibiotic (mis)use an emerging ecological threat to wild insects?. Journal of Insect Physiology. 164. 104837–104837. 1 indexed citations

Archer, C. Ruth, et al.. (2024). Sexual conflict over sex—an underappreciated consequence of childbirth?. Evolution Medicine and Public Health. 12(1). 242–247.

Pennell, Tanya M., et al.. (2024). Predation affects the evolution of sex-specific longevity. Biology Letters. 20(11). 20240451–20240451. 1 indexed citations

Archer, C. Ruth, James Rapkin, Meaghan Castledine, et al.. (2022). Mapping sex differences in the effects of protein and carbohydrates on lifespan and reproduction in Drosophila melanogaster: is measuring nutrient intake essential?. Biogerontology. 23(1). 129–144. 23 indexed citations

Archer, C. Ruth, Maria Paniw, Regina Vega‐Trejo, & Irem Sepil. (2022). A sex skew in life-history research: the problem of missing males. Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences. 289(1979). 20221117–20221117. 13 indexed citations

Archer, C. Ruth, et al.. (2022). Oxidative Damage Is Influenced by Diet But Unaffected by Selection for Early Age of Oviposition in the Marula Fly, Ceratitis cosyra (Diptera: Tephritidae). Frontiers in Physiology. 13. 794979–794979. 3 indexed citations

Archer, C. Ruth, et al.. (2021). Complex relationship between amino acids, fitness and food intake in Bombus terrestris. Amino Acids. 53(10). 1545–1558. 9 indexed citations

Paniw, Maria, C. Ruth Archer, Gesa Römer, et al.. (2021). The myriad of complex demographic responses of terrestrial mammals to climate change and gaps of knowledge: A global analysis. Journal of Animal Ecology. 90(6). 1398–1407. 41 indexed citations

Archer, C. Ruth, et al.. (2021). Dose-dependent effects of antibiotic intake on Bombus Terrestris (Linnaeus, 1758) dietary intake, survival and parasite infection prevalence. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology. 182. 107580–107580. 8 indexed citations

10.

Matsumura, Kentarou, C. Ruth Archer, David J. Hosken, & Takahisa Miyatake. (2019). Artificial selection on walking distance suggests a mobility-sperm competitiveness trade-off. Behavioral Ecology. 30(6). 1522–1529. 14 indexed citations

11.

Hosken, David J., C. Ruth Archer, & Judith E. Mank. (2019). Sexual conflict. Current Biology. 29(11). R451–R455. 19 indexed citations

12.

Tourmente, Maximiliano, C. Ruth Archer, & David J. Hosken. (2019). Complex interactions between sperm viability and female fertility. Scientific Reports. 9(1). 15366–15366. 7 indexed citations

13.

Archer, C. Ruth, et al.. (2018). Life‐history and demographic traits of the marula fruit fly Ceratitis cosyra : potential consequences of host specialization. Physiological Entomology. 43(4). 259–267. 13 indexed citations

14.

Sutter, Andreas, et al.. (2018). Senescent declines in elite tennis players are similar across the sexes. Behavioral Ecology. 3 indexed citations

15.

Hosken, David J., C. Ruth Archer, Clarissa M. House, & Nina Wedell. (2018). Penis evolution across species: divergence and diversity. Nature Reviews Urology. 16(2). 98–106. 12 indexed citations

16.

Archer, C. Ruth, Ugofilippo Basellini, John Hunt, et al.. (2017). Diet has independent effects on the pace and shape of aging in Drosophila melanogaster. Biogerontology. 19(1). 1–12. 9 indexed citations

17.

Archer, C. Ruth, Robert M. Stephens, Manmohan D. Sharma, & David J. Hosken. (2017). The Drosophila simulans Y chromosome interacts with the autosomes to influence male fitness. Journal of Evolutionary Biology. 30(10). 1821–1825. 6 indexed citations

18.

Archer, C. Ruth, et al.. (2017). Effects of macronutrient intake on the lifespan and fecundity of the marula fruit fly, Ceratitis cosyra (Tephritidae): Extreme lifespan in a host specialist. Ecology and Evolution. 7(22). 9808–9817. 18 indexed citations

19.

Archer, C. Ruth & John Hunt. (2015). Understanding the link between sexual selection, sexual conflict and aging using crickets as a model. Experimental Gerontology. 71. 4–13. 15 indexed citations

20.

Archer, C. Ruth, Natalie A. Royle, Sandra H. South, Colin Selman, & John Hunt. (2009). Nutritional Geometry Provides Food for Thought. The Journals of Gerontology Series A. 64A(9). 956–959. 10 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact