Rachel Spencer
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Geriatrics and Gerontology top 5%
- Emergency Medical Services top 5%
- Economics and Econometrics top 10%
- Emergency Medicine top 10%
- Co-authors
- Stephen CampbellAnthony AveryBrian BellRobert C. WardMary Elizabeth CollinsBrian SerumagaJeremy DaleEmma Scott
- Topics
- Patient Safety and Medication Errors (11 papers)Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (10 papers)Emergency and Acute Care Studies (7 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaPLoS ONEJournal of Environmental Management
- Partner nations
- United KingdomQatarUnited States
In The Last Decade
Rachel Spencer
42 papers receiving 445 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
- General Health Professions 140
- Geriatrics and Gerontology 112
- Emergency Medical Services 90
- Economics and Econometrics 85
- Emergency Medicine 54
Countries citing papers authored by Rachel Spencer
This map shows the geographic impact of Rachel Spencer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rachel Spencer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rachel Spencer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Rachel Spencer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rachel Spencer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rachel Spencer. The network helps show where Rachel Spencer may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Rachel Spencer
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Rachel Spencer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Rachel Spencer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Rachel Spencer. Rachel Spencer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 3 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 0 | |
| 12 | 0 | |
| 13 | 21 | |
| 14 | 3 | |
| 15 | 20 | |
| 16 | 51 | |
| 17 | 33 | |
| 18 | 66 | |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | 28 |
About Rachel Spencer
Rachel Spencer is a scholar working on Geriatrics and Gerontology, Emergency Medical Services and Family Practice, having authored 50 papers that have together received 464 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Patient Safety and Medication Errors (11 papers), Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (10 papers) and Emergency and Acute Care Studies (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geriatrics and Gerontology (112 citations), Family Practice (37 citations) and Emergency Medical Services (90 citations). Rachel Spencer has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Qatar and United States. Frequent co-authors include Stephen Campbell, Anthony Avery, Brian Bell, Robert C. Ward, Mary Elizabeth Collins, Brian Serumaga, Jeremy Dale, Emma Scott, Stephanie Schnurr and Caroline Mulvaney. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Journal of Environmental Management.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.