Rob Procter

15.3k total citations · 4 hit papers
271 papers, 8.9k citations indexed

About

Rob Procter is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Artificial Intelligence and Communication. According to data from OpenAlex, Rob Procter has authored 271 papers receiving a total of 8.9k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 86 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 52 papers in Artificial Intelligence and 36 papers in Communication. Recurrent topics in Rob Procter's work include Information Systems Theories and Implementation (36 papers), Hydrogen embrittlement and corrosion behaviors in metals (22 papers) and Scientific Computing and Data Management (18 papers). Rob Procter is often cited by papers focused on Information Systems Theories and Implementation (36 papers), Hydrogen embrittlement and corrosion behaviors in metals (22 papers) and Scientific Computing and Data Management (18 papers). Rob Procter collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Germany. Rob Procter's co-authors include Trisha Greenhalgh, Joseph Wherton, Arkaitz Zubiaga, Maria Liakata, Susan Hinder, V. Ashworth, Alex Voß, S. E. Shaw, Kalina Bontcheva and Gemma Hughes and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and PLoS ONE.

In The Last Decade

Rob Procter

257 papers receiving 8.4k citations

Hit Papers

Beyond Adoption: A New Framework for Theorizing and ... 2011 2026 2016 2021 2017 2011 2018 2016 400 800 1.2k

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Rob Procter United Kingdom 41 2.5k 1.7k 1.4k 1.2k 996 271 8.9k
Matthias Schonlau United States 36 979 0.4× 808 0.5× 2.0k 1.4× 345 0.3× 257 0.3× 107 10.8k
Lina Zhou United States 38 2.4k 0.9× 226 0.1× 2.1k 1.5× 2.0k 1.7× 140 0.1× 197 7.9k
Richard Y. Wang United States 45 1.1k 0.4× 351 0.2× 1.8k 1.3× 2.8k 2.3× 325 0.3× 105 14.0k
Martin Johnson United Kingdom 33 1.5k 0.6× 1.1k 0.7× 106 0.1× 107 0.1× 761 0.8× 180 5.8k
Mohd Javaid India 68 695 0.3× 598 0.3× 2.0k 1.4× 2.4k 2.0× 769 0.8× 237 18.7k
David Ellis United Kingdom 33 3.9k 1.5× 2.3k 1.3× 959 0.7× 1.9k 1.5× 923 0.9× 146 17.3k
P. John Clarkson United Kingdom 54 594 0.2× 578 0.3× 765 0.6× 599 0.5× 312 0.3× 657 14.1k
Ping Yu Australia 35 438 0.2× 1.3k 0.7× 312 0.2× 226 0.2× 512 0.5× 312 4.8k
Seth Flaxman United Kingdom 42 1.2k 0.5× 1.1k 0.6× 1.1k 0.8× 253 0.2× 1.2k 1.2× 109 14.1k
Xitong Guo China 34 2.2k 0.9× 1.2k 0.7× 466 0.3× 317 0.3× 215 0.2× 143 4.7k

Countries citing papers authored by Rob Procter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Rob Procter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rob Procter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rob Procter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Rob Procter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rob Procter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rob Procter. The network helps show where Rob Procter may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Rob Procter

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Rob Procter. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Rob Procter based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Rob Procter. Rob Procter is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
3.
Wang, Bo, et al.. (2021). Evaluation of Thematic Coherence in Microblogs. 6800–6814. 2 indexed citations
4.
Zubiaga, Arkaitz, Ahmet Aker, Kalina Bontcheva, Maria Liakata, & Rob Procter. (2018). Detection and resolution of rumours in social media : a survey \n. Warwick Research Archive Portal (University of Warwick). 471 indexed citations breakdown →
5.
Wang, Bo, Maria Liakata, Symeon Papadopoulos, et al.. (2017). TOTEMSS: Topic-based, Temporal Sentiment Summarisation for Twitter. Warwick Research Archive Portal (University of Warwick). 21–24. 3 indexed citations
6.
Zubiaga, Arkaitz, et al.. (2017). WISC at MediaEval 2017 : multimedia satellite task. Queen Mary Research Online (Queen Mary University of London). 11 indexed citations
7.
Wang, Bo, Maria Liakata, Arkaitz Zubiaga, Rob Procter, & Eric Jensen. (2016). SMILES: Twitter Emotion Classification using Domain.. International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 15–21. 1 indexed citations
8.
Procter, Rob, Robin Williams, James Stewart, et al.. (2010). Adoption and Use of Web 2.0 in Scholarly Communications. SSRN Electronic Journal. 1 indexed citations
9.
Hartswood, Mark, Marina Jirotka, Rob Procter, et al.. (2005). Working IT out in e-Science: experiences of requirements capture in a HealthGrid project.. PubMed. 112. 198–209. 14 indexed citations
10.
Taylor, Paul, Rob Procter, Mark Hartswood, et al.. (2005). Distributed Intelligent Learning Environment for Screening Mammography. UCL Discovery (University College London). 2 indexed citations
11.
Hartswood, Mark, et al.. (2003). Working out IT in Medical Practice: IT systems design and development as co-production. Methods of Information in Medicine. 42(4).
12.
Hartswood, Mark, Rob Procter, Roger Slack, et al.. (2002). Co-realisation: towards a principled synthesis of ethnomethodology and participatory design. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 14(2). 9–30. 84 indexed citations
13.
Shapiro, Dan, Alex Voß, Mark Hartswood, et al.. (2002). Promises, premises and risks : sharing responsibilities, working up trust and sustaining commitment in participatory design projects. Participatory Design Conference. 183–192. 17 indexed citations
14.
Voß, Alex, Rob Procter, Roger Slack, et al.. (2001). Production management and ordinary action : an investigation of situated, resourceful action in production planning and control. Warwick Research Archive Portal (University of Warwick). 2 indexed citations
15.
Gallacher, Sarah, et al.. (2001). The Politics of Usability. Springer US. 6 indexed citations
16.
Hartswood, Mark, Rob Procter, Mark Rouncefield, & Michael Sharpe. (2000). Being there and doing IT in the workplace: A case study of a co-development approach in healthcare. Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University). 96–105. 18 indexed citations
17.
Voß, Alex, Rob Procter, & Robin Williams. (2000). Innovation in use: Interleaving day-to-day operation and systems development. Research Explorer (The University of Manchester). 192–201. 16 indexed citations
18.
Hartswood, Mark & Rob Procter. (2000). Computer-aided mammography: a case study of coping with fallibility in a skilled decision-making task.. PubMed. 20(4). 38–54. 6 indexed citations
19.
Guzmàn, L., Gerhard Wolf, & Rob Procter. (1989). Surface modification of metals by ion beams--6 : proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Surface Modification of Metals by Ion Beams, Riva del Garda, Italy, September 12-16, 1988. Elsevier eBooks. 1 indexed citations
20.
Wolf, Gerhard, W. A. Grant, & Rob Procter. (1985). Surface modification of metals by ion beams, 1984 : proceedings of the International Conference on Surface Modification of Metals by Ion Beams, Heidelberg, F.R.G., September 17-21, 1984. Elsevier eBooks. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026