Rachel E. Crook‐Lyon
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Health
- General Health Professions
- Sociology and Political Science
- Co-authors
- Clara E. HillHyojin ImEmily BecherPatricia J. ShannonShirley A. HessJennifer McClearySarah KnoxTimothy B. Smith
- Topics
- Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (6 papers)Counseling Practices and Supervision (5 papers)Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics (4 papers)
- Journals
- Psychotherapy ResearchPsychological ReportsPsychological Trauma Theory Research Practice and Policy
- Partner nations
- United StatesIrelandSpain
In The Last Decade
Rachel E. Crook‐Lyon
15 papers receiving 213 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
- Clinical Psychology 161
- Social Psychology 100
- Health 45
- General Health Professions 42
- Sociology and Political Science 38
Countries citing papers authored by Rachel E. Crook‐Lyon
This map shows the geographic impact of Rachel E. Crook‐Lyon's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rachel E. Crook‐Lyon with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rachel E. Crook‐Lyon more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Rachel E. Crook‐Lyon
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rachel E. Crook‐Lyon. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rachel E. Crook‐Lyon. The network helps show where Rachel E. Crook‐Lyon may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Rachel E. Crook‐Lyon
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Rachel E. Crook‐Lyon. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Rachel E. Crook‐Lyon based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Rachel E. Crook‐Lyon. Rachel E. Crook‐Lyon is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 16 | |
| 2 | 37 | |
| 3 | Exploring the Experiences of Survivor Students in a Course on Trauma Treatment | 1 |
| 4 | 25 | |
| 5 | 17 | |
| 6 | Corrective Relational Experiences in Psychotherapy | 1 |
| 7 | 30 | |
| 8 | 14 | |
| 9 | 55 | |
| 10 | Implications of Civility for Children and Adolescents: A Review of the Literature. | 5 |
| 11 | 18 | |
| 12 | The Civil Behavior of Students: A Survey of School Professionals. | 5 |
| 13 | Implications of civility for children | 0 |
| 14 | 2 | |
| 15 | 8 | |
| 16 | 7 |
About Rachel E. Crook‐Lyon
Rachel E. Crook‐Lyon is a scholar working on General Psychology, Public Administration and Social Psychology, having authored 16 papers that have together received 241 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (6 papers), Counseling Practices and Supervision (5 papers) and Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (32 citations), Clinical Psychology (161 citations) and Applied Psychology (32 citations). Rachel E. Crook‐Lyon has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Ireland and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Clara E. Hill, Hyojin Im, Emily Becher, Patricia J. Shannon, Shirley A. Hess, Jennifer McCleary, Sarah Knox, Timothy B. Smith, Kari A. O’Grady and Gary Freitas. Their work appears in journals such as Psychotherapy Research, Psychological Reports and Psychological Trauma Theory Research Practice and Policy.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.