Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Stress- and treatment-induced elevations of cortisol levels associated with impaired declarative memory in healthy adults
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael May's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael May with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael May more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael May. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael May. The network helps show where Michael May may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael May
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael May.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael May based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Michael May. Michael May is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
May, Michael. (2014). Auf dem Weg zu einem dialektisch-materialistischen Care-Begriff. Social Science Open Access Repository (GESIS – Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences). 34(134). 11–51.1 indexed citations
May, Michael, et al.. (2012). The Impact of Cultural Diversity on Special Education Provision in the United States.. 13(1). 58–63.6 indexed citations
7.
May, Michael. (2011). Kompetenzorientiert unterrichten – Anforderungssituationen als didaktisches Zentrum politisch-sozialwissenschaftlichen Unterrichts. Social Science Open Access Repository (GESIS – Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences). 60(1).1 indexed citations
8.
May, Michael, Martin Turner, & Tim Morris. (2010). Scale invariant feature transform: A graphical parameter analysis. Research Explorer (The University of Manchester).9 indexed citations
Stankovski, Vlado, et al.. (2004). A Service-Centric Perspective for Data Mining in Complex Problem Solving Environments.. Parallel and Distributed Processing Techniques and Applications. 780–787.12 indexed citations
May, Michael. (2000). Accessible GPS Navigation and Digital Map Information for Blind Consumers. 317–319.1 indexed citations
15.
May, Michael. (1995). Diagrammatisches Denken: Zur Deutung logischer Diagramme als Vorstellungsschemata bei Lakoff und Peirce. Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen). 17. 285–305.1 indexed citations
16.
May, Michael. (1995). Staten som Moder? To aspekter af "behandlingsideologi": den tekniske reduktion og kravet til den Anden. Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen). 6(3). 71–91.
17.
May, Michael, et al.. (1994). Case Report: Cardiotoxic Calcemia. The American Journal of the Medical Sciences. 307(1). 43–44.13 indexed citations
May, Michael & Robert M. Carey. (1986). Mechanism of growth inhibition by dietary branched chain amino acids. Clinical research. 34(1). 223.1 indexed citations
20.
May, Michael, et al.. (1986). GPS UE Data Generator. 192–198.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.