R. S. Tonks

444 citations
20 papers · 336 indexed · h-index 10

R. S. Tonks

20 papers receiving 293 citations

Peers

R. S. Tonks
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 53
  • Internal Medicine 20
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 67
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 44
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 42
Replace Shih‐Yin Chen with:
Shih‐Yin Chen United States
Aleksandra Szybalska Poland
Bartłomiej K. Sołtysik Poland
Sum Lam United States
D Schröder-Bernhardi Germany
Hacene Nedjar Canada
K. A. Pearce United States
Benoît Février France
Winanne Downey Canada
Ferhat Arık Türkiye
R. S. Tonks relative to Shih‐Yin Chen United States Shih‐Yin Chen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Shih‐Yin Chen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by R. S. Tonks

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of R. S. Tonks's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by R. S. Tonks with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites R. S. Tonks more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by R. S. Tonks

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by R. S. Tonks. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by R. S. Tonks. The network helps show where R. S. Tonks may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 13 scholars most cited alongside R. S. Tonks, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with R. S. Tonks Line = papers co-authored together R. S. Tonks links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1
Need for an improved submission process for listing drugs for reimbursement in Canadian provinces.
20032
2 200220
3 200070
4 199918
5
Population trends in the prevalence of benzodiazepine use in the older population of Nova Scotia: A cause for concern?
199918
6 19743
7 19741
8
Proceedings: New method of recording responses of isolated tissues, organs and intact preparations.
19723
9 19691
10 19696
11 196810
12 19686
13 19683
14 196624
15 196550
16 196250
17 195916
18 195633
19 19541
20
Some pharmacological properties of a series of substituted ethylenediamines.
19531

About R. S. Tonks

R. S. Tonks is a scholar working on Internal Medicine, Geriatrics and Gerontology and Neurology, having authored 20 papers that have together received 336 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Antiplatelet Therapy and Cardiovascular Diseases (2 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (2 papers), Renal and Vascular Pathologies (2 papers), Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy (2 papers), Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management (2 papers), Blood properties and coagulation (1 paper), Synthesis of heterocyclic compounds (1 paper) and Sleep and related disorders (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Geriatrics and Gerontology (53 citations), Internal Medicine (20 citations) and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (67 citations). R. S. Tonks has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include A. M. Hughes, Daniel Carver, Vince Salazar Thomas, Carlos Rojas‐Fernandez, Kenneth Rockwood, Karen Stadnyk, Kathleen MacPherson, Paul Stolee, Colin Powell and Roianne West. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, The Lancet and Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026