Benoît Février

13 papers receiving 364 citations

Peers

Benoît Février
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
  • Internal Medicine 66
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 42
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 23
  • Physiology 119
  • Pharmacy 22
Replace Maria Luisi with:
Maria Luisi Italy
P. Deurenberg Netherlands
Bartłomiej K. Sołtysik Poland
Santiago Domínguez Coello Spain
Phil Ades United States
R. Grant United Kingdom
Sara Salini Italy
Su Shen China
James Gerofi Australia
Benoît Février relative to Maria Luisi Italy Maria Luisi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.7×
Maria Luisi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Benoît Février

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Benoît Février's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Benoît Février with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Benoît Février more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Benoît Février

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Benoît Février. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Benoît Février. The network helps show where Benoît Février may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Benoît Février, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Benoît Février Line = papers co-authored together Benoît Février links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 200495
2 199783
3 200567
4 199754
5 199525
6 200621
7
Lipid profile and antihypertensive efficacy in hyperlipidemic hypertensive patients: comparison of rilmenidine and captopril.
199510
8 19959
9 19958
10 19947
11 19952
12
[Physiopathology of leg ulcer of venous origin].
19961
13
[Effects of rilmenidine (hyperium) on lipid balance in hyperlipidemic hypertensive patients. Randomized, controlled, double-blind 8-week study vs. captopril in parallel groups].
19961

About Benoît Février

Benoît Février is a scholar working on Surgery, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Internal Medicine, Oncology and Physiology, having authored 13 papers that have together received 383 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Diagnosis and Treatment of Venous Diseases (3 papers), Lymphatic System and Diseases (2 papers), Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies (2 papers), Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management (2 papers), Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins (1 paper), Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology (1 paper), Mental Health Research Topics (1 paper) and Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Internal Medicine (66 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (42 citations), Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (23 citations), Physiology (119 citations) and Pharmacy (22 citations). Benoît Février has collaborated with scholars based in France and Italy. Frequent co-authors include G Pillion, Annick Alpérovitch, Pascale Barberger‐Gateau, Karen Ritchie, A Pecking, Karine Pérès, Claudine Berr, Luc Letenneur, Sophie Larrieu and Christophe Tzourio. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology, The American Journal of Cardiology, International Journal of Obesity, Stroke and Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact