Daniel Carver

9 papers receiving 515 citations

Peers

Daniel Carver
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 118
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 145
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 94
  • Developmental Neuroscience 56
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 181
Replace José Antônio Ésper Curiati with:
José Antônio Ésper Curiati Brazil
Ming‐Yueh Chou Taiwan
Stefano Boffelli Italy
Jane Clarke Australia
Melissa M. Dolan United States
Kathryn Knott United States
Ciara McGlade Ireland
Elke Detroyer Belgium
Sarah Richardson United Kingdom
Melinda R. Steis United States
Daniel Carver relative to José Antônio Ésper Curiati Brazil José Antônio Ésper Curiati's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
José Antônio Ésper Curiati · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Carver

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Carver's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Carver with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Carver more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Carver

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Carver. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Carver. The network helps show where Daniel Carver may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 21 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Carver, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Carver Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Carver links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
#Work
1 2003150
2 1994148
3 200790
4 200070
5 201430
6 199918
7
Population trends in the prevalence of benzodiazepine use in the older population of Nova Scotia: A cause for concern?
199918
8 200510
9 19943

About Daniel Carver

Daniel Carver is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Psychiatry and Mental health, Economics and Econometrics, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine and Geriatrics and Gerontology, having authored 9 papers that have together received 537 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (4 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (4 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (3 papers), Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (2 papers), Frailty in Older Adults (2 papers), Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (1 paper), Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies (1 paper) and Emergency and Acute Care Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Geriatrics and Gerontology (118 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (145 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (94 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (56 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (181 citations). Daniel Carver has collaborated with scholars based in Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Paul Stolee, Kenneth Rockwood, Colin Powell, Karen Stadnyk, Susan E. Howlett, B. J. O’Brien, Kenneth Rockwood, Pamela Jarrett, David M. Kydd and R. S. Tonks. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, American Journal of Medical Quality, BMC Neurology, Clinical Therapeutics and Journal of Clinical Epidemiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact