R. R. Laxton
- Molecular Biology
- Computational Theory and Mathematics top 5%
- Algebra and Number Theory top 10%
- Artificial Intelligence
- Geometry and Topology top 10%
- Co-authors
- P. C. FishburnPeter HarveyR W BaldwinR. A. RobinsHannah ForsythMary Jane MahonyH. HalberstamWilliam Parry
- Topics
- Tree-ring climate responses (6 papers)Rings, Modules, and Algebras (6 papers)Building materials and conservation (4 papers)
- Cited by
- Algebra and Number TheoryDiscrete Mathematics and CombinatoricsComputational Theory and Mathematics
- Partner nations
- United KingdomAustraliaUnited States
In The Last Decade
R. R. Laxton
35 papers receiving 522 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 129
- Molecular Biology 115
- Computational Theory and Mathematics 100
- Algebra and Number Theory 83
- Artificial Intelligence 63
- Geometry and Topology 54
Countries citing papers authored by R. R. Laxton
This map shows the geographic impact of R. R. Laxton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by R. R. Laxton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites R. R. Laxton more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by R. R. Laxton
This network shows the impact of papers produced by R. R. Laxton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by R. R. Laxton. The network helps show where R. R. Laxton may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of R. R. Laxton
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of R. R. Laxton. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of R. R. Laxton based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with R. R. Laxton. R. R. Laxton is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Developing Communities of Practice Around E-learning and Project Management | 4 |
| 2 | 36 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 20 | |
| 5 | The Bayesian approach to archaeological data analysis: An application of change-point analysis to prehistoric domes | 1 |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 4 | |
| 9 | 141 | |
| 10 | 7 | |
| 11 | 96 | |
| 12 | 2 | |
| 13 | 3 | |
| 14 | 4 | |
| 15 | 2 | |
| 16 | 17 | |
| 17 | 7 | |
| 18 | 7 | |
| 19 | 19 | |
| 20 | 16 |
About R. R. Laxton
R. R. Laxton is a scholar working on Algebra and Number Theory, Archeology and Archeology, having authored 45 papers that have together received 634 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Tree-ring climate responses (6 papers), Rings, Modules, and Algebras (6 papers) and Building materials and conservation (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Algebra and Number Theory (83 citations), Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics (33 citations) and Computational Theory and Mathematics (100 citations). R. R. Laxton has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include P. C. Fishburn, Peter Harvey, R W Baldwin, R. A. Robins, Hannah Forsyth, Mary Jane Mahony, H. Halberstam, William Parry, Michael R. Price and Martin C. Garnett. Their work appears in journals such as Tectonophysics, Journal of Theoretical Biology and Journal of Immunological Methods.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.