E. M. Wright

92 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

E. M. Wright
Comparison fields: 5 of 150
  • Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics 250
  • Algebra and Number Theory 132
  • Mathematical Physics 230
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 387
  • Geometry and Topology 208
Replace Peter Hilton with:
Peter Hilton United States
William Watkins United States
Douglas Lind United States
R. F. Williams United States
Allen J. Schwenk United States
Jerrold W. Grossman United States
Jonathan D. H. Smith United States
Gary Davis Australia
J. C. P. Miller United Kingdom
Robert C. James United States
E. M. Wright relative to Peter Hilton United States Peter Hilton's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.0×
Peter Hilton · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by E. M. Wright

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of E. M. Wright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E. M. Wright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E. M. Wright more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by E. M. Wright

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by E. M. Wright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E. M. Wright. The network helps show where E. M. Wright may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside E. M. Wright, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with E. M. Wright Line = papers co-authored together E. M. Wright links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 98 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1979215
2 197785
3 199677
4 201055
5 198041
6 196540
7 197040
8
An Elementary Middle English Grammar
197939
9 198539
10 197138
11 201531
12 196625
13
Old English grammar
198323
14 196723
15 196822
16 200222
17 195918
18 197017
19 195614
20 198614

About E. M. Wright

E. M. Wright is a scholar working on Computational Theory and Mathematics, Geometry and Topology, Algebra and Number Theory, Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics and Theoretical Computer Science, having authored 98 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Graph Theory Research (20 papers), Graph theory and applications (11 papers), Analytic Number Theory Research (10 papers), Graph Labeling and Dimension Problems (9 papers), History and Theory of Mathematics (6 papers), Advanced Mathematical Identities (6 papers), Mathematics and Applications (5 papers) and graph theory and CDMA systems (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics (250 citations), Algebra and Number Theory (132 citations), Mathematical Physics (230 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (387 citations) and Geometry and Topology (208 citations). E. M. Wright has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Michael Whitaker, R. M. Patel, Nile M. Khanfar, Catherine Harrington, Martin Wilding, Graham C. R. Ellis‐Davies, Geoffrey Yarranton, M K Robinson, C. A. Caulcott and Roland Clift. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the London Mathematical Society, The Quarterly Journal of Mathematics, Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society, Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society and Journal of Graph Theory.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact