R. PION

79 papers receiving 687 citations

Peers

R. PION
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 84
  • Reproductive Medicine 84
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 78
  • Animal Science and Zoology 74
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 118
Replace Iqbal Khan with:
Iqbal Khan United States
Bengt Fredricsson Sweden
K.T. Kirton United States
R. I. Cox Australia
C. J. Thompson United Kingdom
Olive W. Smith United States
Nirmal Kumar Lohiya India
Cheryl L. Clark United States
E. Payne Australia
Héctor Bourges Mexico
R. PION relative to Iqbal Khan United States Iqbal Khan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Iqbal Khan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by R. PION

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of R. PION's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by R. PION with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites R. PION more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by R. PION

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by R. PION. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by R. PION. The network helps show where R. PION may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside R. PION, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with R. PION Line = papers co-authored together R. PION links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1
E-Care: Made Possible by Technologic Covergence
20012
2 19801
3
הציוניות מנקודת השקפת הדת
19792
4 197911
5 19774
6 19766
7 19756
8 19710
9 19711
10 19716
11 19701
12 19698
13 19696
14 196814
15 196722
16 196610
17 196619
18
Testicular feminization : endocrine function of feminizing testes comparison with normal testes
19652
19 196426
20 19631

About R. PION

R. PION is a scholar working on Agronomy and Crop Science, Cell Biology, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Obstetrics and Gynecology and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 90 papers that have together received 798 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Muscle metabolism and nutrition (8 papers), Hormonal and reproductive studies (6 papers), Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology (6 papers), Sexual Differentiation and Disorders (5 papers), Phytase and its Applications (5 papers), Birth, Development, and Health (4 papers), DNA Repair Mechanisms (3 papers) and Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (84 citations), Reproductive Medicine (84 citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (78 citations), Animal Science and Zoology (74 citations) and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (118 citations). R. PION has collaborated with scholars based in United States, France and Niger. Frequent co-authors include Hans H. Simmer, William J. Dignam, Ralph W. Hale, Nathaniel N. Wagner, James D. Kitchin, Robert E. Cleary, Yasuo Hotta, B. Ribadeau‐Dumas, Herbert Stern and Satoshi Tabata. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Clinical Obstetrics & Gynecology, Chromosoma, annales de biologie animale biochimie biophysique and The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026