David E. Pingry

683 citations
37 papers · 476 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

David E. Pingry

33 papers receiving 400 citations

Peers

David E. Pingry
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
  • Management Information Systems 144
  • Management Science and Operations Research 112
  • Information Systems and Management 50
  • Strategy and Management 107
  • General Decision Sciences 11
Replace Pooya Tabesh with:
Pooya Tabesh United States
Jayavel Sounderpandian United States
Chenchen Yang China
Björn Häckel Germany
Haili Zhang China
Bo van der Rhee Netherlands
Darek Haftor Sweden
Kiran Sood India
K. Maddulety India
David E. Pingry relative to Pooya Tabesh United States Pooya Tabesh's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Pooya Tabesh · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David E. Pingry

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David E. Pingry's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David E. Pingry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David E. Pingry more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David E. Pingry

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David E. Pingry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David E. Pingry. The network helps show where David E. Pingry may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 12 scholars most cited alongside David E. Pingry, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David E. Pingry Line = papers co-authored together David E. Pingry links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199378
2 200446
3 200442
4 197434
5 201833
6 200731
7 200922
8 200922
9 199317
10
The Process Analysis Alternative to Statistical Cost Functions: Comment
197413
11 199312
12 197211
13 199111
14 198811
15 197910
16 20098
17 19868
18 19738
19 19867
20 20047

About David E. Pingry

David E. Pingry is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Management Information Systems, Management Science and Operations Research, Strategy and Management and Ocean Engineering, having authored 37 papers that have together received 476 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Digital Platforms and Economics (5 papers), Water resources management and optimization (5 papers), Auction Theory and Applications (4 papers), Big Data and Business Intelligence (3 papers), Intellectual Property and Patents (3 papers), Business Strategy and Innovation (3 papers), Innovation Policy and R&D (3 papers) and Outsourcing and Supply Chain Management (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management Information Systems (144 citations), Management Science and Operations Research (112 citations), Information Systems and Management (50 citations), Strategy and Management (107 citations) and General Decision Sciences (11 citations). David E. Pingry has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Norway and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Matt E. Thatcher, James R. Marsden, Andrew B. Whinston, R. Mark Isaac, Robert Franciosi, Stanley S. Reynolds, Seo Jang Hoon, Andrew B. Whinston, Manju Ahuja and Robert D. St. Louis. Their work appears in journals such as Decision Support Systems, Journal of Management Information Systems, Communications of the ACM, Water Resources Research and Information & Management.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact